As I’ve long-argued on most of my websites, the globalist elite cabal desperately wants us to abandon real meats such as beef and chicken, replacing them with plant-based meats, lab-grown meats, and insects.
The plant-based meat industry is what it is; there are those who do not eat meat so there’s a natural market for them. But lab-grown meats and insects are being artificially inserted into society, not because there’s a shortage of real meat but because the powers-that-be pretend to think climate change is going to kill us.
In reality, they don’t think that, at least not most of them. They weaponize climate change hysteria to force obtuse policies on us. Replacing real meat with abominable alternatives is one such policy. Thankfully, some world leaders are starting to push back.
I’ve also argued on my websites that artificial intelligence is being used to not only advance the narrative now, but to craft the narrative for the future. Globalists like Yuval Noah Harari and Klaus Schwab have been promoting artificial intelligence as better for work, governance, and overall decision-making. That’s why it’s no surprise that when I asked AI chatbot ChatGPT to write an article about lab-grown meat and insects replacing real meat, the result was perfectly aligned with the globalist agenda.
Keep in mind, I did not ask the AI bot to editorialize or make the case for lab-grown meat or insects. I simply asked it to write an article about the possibility. On its own accord, it added biased comments such as “lab-grown meat and insects offer exciting alternatives.” Even as it described the downsides, it did so in a way that was basically a sales pitch for a future without real meat.
Here’s the article by ChatGPT AI, verbatim:
Will Lab-Grown Meats and Insects Replace Real Meat?
by ChatGPT
Meat consumption has been a long-standing cultural and culinary tradition for many societies around the world. However, the rising global demand for meat has led to environmental, ethical, and health concerns, prompting a search for sustainable alternatives. Two possible solutions that have gained traction in recent years are lab-grown meat and insect-based protein sources.
Lab-grown meat, also known as cultured meat, is produced by taking a small sample of animal muscle cells and growing them in a lab using a nutrient-rich culture medium. The resulting product is biologically identical to conventional meat but without the associated animal welfare, environmental, and health issues. This innovation offers a sustainable and humane alternative to traditional meat production. The process has gained much interest and investment, with several startups and established companies working on developing commercially viable products.
Insects, on the other hand, have been consumed by humans for thousands of years, but only in a few cultures. Insects are high in protein, low in fat, and rich in micronutrients. They require fewer resources and produce fewer greenhouse gases than traditional livestock. Insects can be reared using food waste and other organic materials, making them an eco-friendly protein source. While insects are already consumed in some countries, such as Thailand, Cambodia, and Mexico, many Western societies have yet to adopt them as a food source.
While lab-grown meat and insects offer exciting alternatives to traditional meat production, there are still several challenges to overcome. One of the main obstacles for lab-grown meat is cost. The technology is still in its early stages, and producing meat in a lab is still more expensive than raising animals. Moreover, the public’s perception of the product is still in its infancy, and consumers may not be willing to pay a premium for cultured meat until it becomes more widely accepted.
Similarly, while insects may offer a sustainable and environmentally friendly alternative, cultural biases against consuming insects remain prevalent in many societies. This bias, combined with regulatory hurdles, has made it challenging to establish insect farming as a viable industry.
Despite the challenges, the benefits of lab-grown meat and insect-based protein sources are significant. They offer sustainable, humane, and eco-friendly alternatives to traditional meat production, which will be critical as the global population continues to grow. As technology advances and public perception shifts, lab-grown meat and insects may become a staple in our diets, helping us to live more sustainably while enjoying the taste and nutritional benefits of meat.
I’ve said it before and I’ll keep saying it until they physically shut me up. I will not be eating any of their abominations, nor will my family. This is why we just launched the only beef company in America that sells both frozen beef boxes for the near-term and freeze-dried beef for long term storage.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
