Most Christians think the age of the Earth and the days of creation aren’t that important. But what if that idea is costing us more than we realize? It’s easy to see these topics as side issues, but they strike at the heart of something crucial: the authority of the Bible. Compromising here can have big consequences for how we understand everything else.
Video summary generated by Artificial Intelligence.
Understanding Theological Triage
Ever heard of theological triage? It’s a way to prioritize what we believe. Al Mohler, president of Southern Baptist Theological Seminary in Louisville, Kentucky, came up with the idea. Think of it like an emergency room. Doctors and nurses use a triage system to decide who needs help first. Someone with a heart attack gets immediate attention, while someone with a sprained ankle might have to wait. Mohler’s theological triage applies this idea to Christian doctrines. It helps us see which beliefs are most important.
Theological triage has three levels:
- First-Order Issues: These are the core beliefs. Think of the Trinity, Jesus’ death and resurrection, how we’re saved through faith, the full deity and humanity of Christ, and the authority of Scripture. Without these, the Christian faith falls apart.
- Second-Order Issues: These are important doctrines that can divide Christians. Different denominations often disagree on these. Examples include how we baptize, or whether women can be pastors.
- Third-Order Issues: These are doctrines Christians can disagree on and still be in fellowship. Things like different views on the end times (eschatology) or the Calvinism vs. Arminianism debate fall into this category.
So, where does the age of the Earth and the six literal days of creation fit in?
Why the Earth’s Age Isn’t a “Side Issue”
Many argue that the age of the Earth isn’t a first-order issue. After all, it’s not directly tied to salvation. The Bible doesn’t say, “Believe in Jesus and that the Earth is young to be saved.” But here’s the thing: the age of the Earth is a biblical authority issue. And that makes it a first-order issue.
Think about it this way. If we can’t trust what the Bible says about creation, where do we draw the line? What else can we decide to reinterpret or dismiss?
The Genesis 3 Connection
Remember Genesis 3? The serpent asked Eve, “Did God really say…?” That was the first attack on God’s word. The devil wasn’t just trying to get Eve to eat a piece of fruit. He was questioning God’s authority. He was saying, “Don’t believe God. Trust yourself instead.”
The same thing happens today when we challenge the biblical account of creation. We’re essentially saying, “God didn’t really mean what He said.” We’re trusting our own interpretation over God’s clear word. This leads to compromise, and just like in the Garden of Eden, it has consequences.
The “Millions of Years” Question
Where does the idea of millions or billions of years come from? It’s definitely not from Scripture. These ideas come from outside the Bible. People take these outside ideas and try to fit them into Scripture, which leads to a reinterpretation of the creation account.
If you simply read Genesis, what does it say? The Hebrew word “yom,” translated as “day,” means an ordinary day in its context. Each of the six days uses this word. A straightforward reading of Genesis, including the genealogies, points to a young Earth, thousands of years old.
Taking God at His Word
It all comes down to biblical authority. Is God’s word the foundation of our worldview? Or do we add outside ideas to it? It’s vital to start with Scripture first.
For a deeper dive into this topic, check out The Lie, available on the Answers in Genesis website.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
