Is the media twisting the narrative around Donald Trump’s accomplishments? According to former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, the answer is a resounding yes. In a fiery interview, Gingrich doesn’t mince words, accusing the left of outright lies and deliberate misrepresentation when it comes to Trump’s first 100 days and beyond. He argues that these aren’t just criticisms, but calculated attacks from opponents “terrified” by the changes Trump represents.
Video summary generated with Artificial Intelligence.
Gingrich draws a sharp distinction between critics and opponents. He believes those attacking Trump aren’t offering constructive feedback. Instead, he says they are actively trying to undermine him. “They lie about it,” Gingrich declares, setting the stage for a series of accusations about the left’s tactics. It’s a bold claim, suggesting a deliberate effort to mislead the public.
One of Gingrich’s main targets is polling data. He alleges that major left-leaning publications use “totally false models” that underrepresent Republicans by as much as 16 to 20%. According to Gingrich, this skewed data leads to inaccurate conclusions about Trump’s approval ratings. He points to polls from Rasmuson and Matt Towery as examples of those that provide a more accurate measure by including Republicans in their sampling. Are these polls really that different? It’s worth looking into the methodologies to understand the potential biases.
Gingrich doesn’t stop at questioning polling data. He goes on to accuse the left of lying about specific issues, starting with Medicaid. He claims Republicans are actually increasing Medicaid funding, not cutting it. He also mentions other areas where he believes the left is spreading falsehoods, such as Trump’s actions and the power of district courts. What are these specific actions that Gingrich refers to?
Trump: A Transformative President in the Vein of Lincoln and Roosevelt?
Here’s where Gingrich makes a truly striking comparison. He argues that Trump is one of only five presidents in American history to profoundly change the establishment. He puts Trump in the company of Jefferson, Jackson, Lincoln, and Roosevelt. That’s a bold statement! Think about the impact those other presidents had. Jefferson expanded the country, Jackson championed the common man, Lincoln saved the Union, and Roosevelt redefined the role of government.
Gingrich argues that Trump’s efforts to shake up the status quo are the reason he faces such fierce opposition. He even points to the judiciary, referencing Justice Jackson, as a tool being used to block Trump’s agenda.
A Quick Look at the Transformative Four
- Thomas Jefferson: Known for the Louisiana Purchase, which doubled the size of the United States.
- Andrew Jackson: Championed populism and challenged the established elite.
- Abraham Lincoln: Preserved the Union and ended slavery.
- Franklin Delano Roosevelt: Implemented the New Deal to combat the Great Depression.
Trump’s First 100 Days: Securing the Border and Boosting the Economy
Gingrich defends Trump’s accomplishments during his first 100 days, focusing on two key areas: border security and the economy.
Gingrich asserts that Trump secured the border, a feat he claims Biden “couldn’t do in four years.” How did Trump accomplish this, according to Gingrich?
Gingrich highlights the low unemployment and inflation rates during Trump’s first 100 days. He emphasizes that Trump’s economic package hadn’t even been passed yet. Drawing a parallel to Reagan, whose economic package was passed later in his first year, Gingrich expresses optimism that Trump’s policies will lead to significant wealth creation.
The Underreported Investment Boom: Trillions Pouring In?
Gingrich claims that “nobody’s covering the scale of the investments that are pouring into the country.” He projects $7-10 trillion in new investments. He points to Mercedes expanding its Alabama plant and Swiss companies investing $73 billion as specific examples.
He connects this investment boom to the new tax bill, which he believes could lead to a “Trump boom” by 2026. Gingrich suggests that this economic success could pave the way for Republican control of the House and Senate.
What’s Next? The Democrats’ Playbook: Smears and Impeachment
Gingrich hints at the Democrats’ strategy, predicting more smears, attacks, and even impeachment attempts. Will these tactics resonate with the American public? What exactly is the Democrats’ program?
Gingrich clearly believes that the left is actively working to undermine Donald Trump. He paints a picture of deliberate misrepresentation, skewed data, and outright lies. Whether you agree with his assessment or not, it’s a perspective that’s sure to spark debate.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
