- Several prominent hospitals, including Cleveland Clinic, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Henry Ford Health, Memorial Hermann Health System and Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, are accused of continuing to perform gender transition procedures on minors despite the Trump administration’s directive to halt such practices, risking the loss of federal funding.
- The report highlights the hospitals’ ongoing commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, with some maintaining robust infrastructures like “Diversity Coordinators” and “Diversity Councils.” This is seen as evidence of institutional defiance and a prioritization of ideological agendas over compliance with federal directives.
- The report argues that these hospitals are misusing tax breaks, federal funding and mandated discount programs to support projects unrelated to patient care, such as promoting left-wing activism and non-health-related books, rather than passing benefits on to patients and lowering costs.
- The report raises significant medical and ethical concerns, citing evidence that more than 80 percent of children with gender dysphoria outgrow it by late adolescence and that reassignment procedures often fail to resolve underlying issues, potentially exacerbating feelings of self-harm and suicide. Testimonies from detransitioners further highlight the alleged bias and negligence within the medical establishment.
- The report emphasizes the need for greater transparency and accountability within the medical community. It criticizes the adoption of an activist approach to gender transitions, suggesting that ideological beliefs may be influencing clinical decisions and compromising patient care, particularly for vulnerable populations like children.
(Natural News)—A new report suggests that several prominent hospitals may be defying the Trump administration’s directive to halt gender transition procedures on minors. This development raises critical questions about medical compliance, institutional accountability and the long-term implications for children undergoing these procedures.
The report, released in March by the conservative watchdog group Consumers’ Research, targets five major hospitals: Cleveland Clinic, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Henry Ford Health, Memorial Hermann Health System and Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital. It alleges that these hospitals are continuing to perform gender transition procedures on minors and promote left-wing activism, despite President Donald Trump’s clear directives to cease such practices or face the loss of federal funding.
The report paints a troubling picture of institutional defiance. Cleveland Clinic, for instance, is accused of maintaining a robust infrastructure for gender transitions, including “Diversity Coordinators,” “Diversity Councils” and an Office of Diversity & Inclusion that actively manages “diversity pipeline talent.” As of March, the Daily Caller reports that the Cleveland Clinic continues to perform gender transitions on minors.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, another institution named in the report, has been under scrutiny since a 2022 exposé revealed the lucrative nature of its Clinic for Transgender Health. Despite apparent efforts to remove DEI-related content from its public-facing websites, Consumers’ Research remains skeptical, noting that some websites are still accessible via password-protected portals.
Henry Ford Health’s DEI agenda has drawn significant criticism, prompting an official complaint to be filed with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in April. The report alleges that the health system continues to perform underage gender transitions, despite the regulatory changes. Similarly, Memorial Hermann Health System, which rebranded its Institute for the Advancement of Health Equity in February, is accused of perpetuating DEI initiatives under a different guise.
Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, while claiming only to offer chemical rather than surgical gender transitions, is still implicated in the report. The hospital’s promotion of non-health-related books that advocate for the “systemic racism” view of America further fuels the perception that it prioritizes ideological agendas over patient care.
The report argues that these hospitals are misusing their tax breaks, federal funding and mandated discount programs to support projects unrelated to patient care. “Instead of passing benefits on to patients and lowering costs, hospitals use these programs to fund political priorities outside of their core mission,” the report states.
The medical and ethical debate
A significant body of evidence suggests that affirming gender confusion in children can have serious consequences. Studies indicate that more than 80 percent of children with gender dysphoria outgrow it by late adolescence. Moreover, “reassignment” procedures have been found to fail in resolving the underlying issues, often exacerbating feelings of self-harm and suicide. The report cites the testimonies of detransitioners who have experienced physical and mental harm as a result of these procedures, highlighting the medical establishment’s alleged bias and negligence. (Related: Trump administration reaffirms: Gender-related procedures are CHILD ABUSE.)
Many detransitioners have criticized the medical community for adopting an activist approach to gender transitions, arguing that doctors often approach cases with a predetermined conclusion in favor of transitioning. This critique suggests a systemic issue within the medical field, where ideological beliefs may be influencing clinical decisions.
The report underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability within the medical community. As hospitals continue to navigate the complex intersection of medicine, ethics and politics, they must prioritize the well-being of their patients above all else. The allegations raised in the report highlight the potential dangers of allowing ideological agendas to influence medical practice, particularly when it involves vulnerable populations like children.
Watch this video that talks about a judge who blocked Trump’s order to end treatment for transgender inmates.
More related stories:
- Trump threatens to cut federal funding to California over transgender athlete controversy.
- Trump administration orders renaming of USNS Harvey Milk.
- Trump’s fiscal year 2026 budget proposal slashes DEI, LGBTQ+ and abortion funding.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
