(Zero Hedge)—Comedian and actor Russell Brand was sentenced to nine years in prison on Monday for rape and sexual assault in a UK courtroom. The total sentence is 10 years and six months.
A jury convicted Brand on Thursday of one count of rape and three counts of sexual assault, and acquitted him of two other rape counts and one count of attempted indecent assault. He has denied all the charges.
“About 20 years ago, Russell Brand, you were becoming famous. You were clever – and in many people’s eyes, funny and charismatic. You had also become a sexual predator,” said Judge Joel Bennathan shortly before sentencing. “Your status protected you until 2023 when journalists published allegations.”
Bennathan then relayed the sexual assaults Brand committed against the women – starting with attacks on one woman in a London pub where he groped the breast of a fellow party attendee.
“The effect on her had her wandering the streets of London, phoning a friend in the middle of the night, tearful and distressed,” he said, before detailing another assault in which Brand, visiting a radio station with an entourage, launched himself at a woman – groping and kissing her in front of her colleagues.
Prosecutor Karmy-Jones KC asked for the most serious sentencing category for the rape, which carries a starting point of 12 years and a range of 10 to 15. She told the court Brand “abused the influence and power that came with his fame” and “used it to facilitate an access to women without which the offending could not have taken place.” She asked for one to four years on each of the three sexual assault counts.
The rape victim was 21 when it happened, Karmy-Jones said, and Brand knew she idolized him. He pursued her by text and phone call, offered advice on her relationship with her boyfriend, then told her he would look out for her when the couple split, before the assault at his home. “The court will wish to consider whether this introduces an element of abuse, of trust and manipulation,” she said. The woman feared for months afterward that she had contracted HIV, the prosecutor said, and Brand sent her messages calling her “dirty.” She also told the court that he must “bear some responsibility for the culture of tolerance that existed around him” that let his offending continue for years.
The woman told the court in a victim impact statement that she gave up her plan to become a stand-up comedian and drank more to “block out my feelings and memories.” “His public profile meant he remained present in my life even when I wanted to move on,” she said, adding that she did not report him sooner because “I felt that if I reported him, I would not be believed. His fame, wealth and influence created a power imbalance which made me feel powerless.” Karmy-Jones read three victim statements in all. One woman, who read hers aloud to the judge, said she had carried “that undeserved feeling of shame” for 20 years.
Brand’s lawyer, Ian Winter KC, argued that the offense belonged between sentencing categories two and three. He told the judge the woman had gone to Brand’s home for consensual sex and that Brand “did not respect her consent in two areas,” moving to anal sex and removing the condom, and said that “there was no planning, no premeditation.” Winter said that afterward Brand telling her she was dirty and having her clean the sheets did not make the crime more serious.
Winter called the offenses “isolated incidents” from 17 years ago and said Brand has been a changed man since 2015. He said the last offense came shortly before Brand met his first wife, the singer Katy Perry. Brand is “not the monster portrayed outside this courtroom,” Winter said, and a jail term would have a “catastrophic” effect on his wife, Laura, and their young children. He said many people had come forward to speak of Brand’s good deeds, but none wanted to go on the record. “We invite mercy,” he told the judge.
The judge agreed with the prosecution that Brand’s fame magnified the victims’ pain, because they kept seeing him in the media, and that several of the women worked in his industry, which made him harder to escape. Judge Bennathan said after the verdict that a “significant custodial term” is inevitable. Brand was denied bail and has been in custody since Thursday. As we reported, his first night included a strip search and a round-the-clock watch. Police are investigating rape allegations from two more women, and Brand could face further charges, the Guardian reported.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
