Georgia Republicans delivered a clear verdict on Tuesday as Brad Raffensperger’s time in the spotlight is over. The Secretary of State, who gained national notoriety for his resistance to efforts challenging the 2020 presidential results in the Peach State, finished a distant third in the Republican gubernatorial primary. Lt. Gov. Burt Jones, endorsed by President Donald Trump, and billionaire businessman Rick Jackson advanced to a June 16 runoff, underscoring the party’s decisive shift toward unapologetic conservatism.
This outcome was no surprise to those tracking the race. Raffensperger entered as a well-known incumbent but carried the heavy baggage of his 2020 decisions, which many in the base viewed as insufficiently protective of election integrity amid widespread concerns over irregularities. His campaign emphasized jobs, lower taxes, and administrative competence, yet it failed to resonate in a party that has increasingly demanded leaders willing to confront institutional failures head-on.
The primary exposed deep fractures within Georgia’s GOP, but the results point toward consolidation around candidates who align with President Trump’s vision. Jones, a sixth-generation Georgian, business owner, and family man, positioned himself as a defender of conservative values, school choice, tax cuts, and public safety.
His Trump endorsement proved a powerful asset, reminding voters of the need for loyalty to the America First agenda that delivered strong results during Trump’s presidency.
Jackson, a political newcomer and healthcare executive, disrupted the field with enormous self-financed spending—reportedly exceeding $65 million. His campaign focused on economic growth and shaking up the status quo, appealing to voters frustrated with establishment figures. Together, their dominance over Raffensperger and Carr illustrates how the party has moved beyond the Chamber of Commerce mindset toward a more populist, results-oriented conservatism.
Raffensperger rose to prominence defending Georgia’s 2020 certification against legal and public challenges. While he touted election security improvements in subsequent years, many Republicans remembered his public clashes with Trump and his refusal to pursue more aggressive avenues for addressing voter concerns. That history proved toxic in a primary where the base prioritized fidelity to scrutinizing every aspect of electoral processes.
Similar scenes played out elsewhere, with Trump-backed challengers defeating critics in other states. Georgia’s contest serves as a microcosm of the broader realignment: voters are rewarding fighters and rejecting those perceived as too willing to accommodate the opposition’s narratives.
The runoff between Jones and Jackson will test whether Trump’s endorsement or vast personal wealth carries more weight. Both candidates have already invested heavily, and the contest promises to be expensive and intense. Yet it also offers an opportunity for the eventual nominee to unify the party against a Democratic opponent in what remains a battleground state.
Georgia Republicans have signaled they will not tolerate half-measures on core issues like election integrity, fiscal responsibility, and cultural preservation. As the general election approaches, the nominee will face a Democrat likely emphasizing progressive priorities rejected by most Georgians.
This moment recalls the Apostle Paul’s charge in Ephesians 6:13: “Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand.”
Georgia’s voters chose candidates prepared to stand firm. The days of rewarding compromise are fading, replaced by a party demanding accountability and courage from its leaders.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
