- The U.S. Open golf tournament and the NBA’s new Intuit Dome are implementing facial recognition technology for “frictionless” entry and fan personalization, normalizing surveillance in public leisure spaces.
- Critics warn that marketing these systems as conveniences conceals deeper issues, including diminished privacy, lack of informed consent and the quiet expansion of biometric surveillance in everyday life.
- Taylor Swift’s concerts and Madison Square Garden used facial recognition to track or ban individuals without their knowledge, raising ethical and legal red flags about discrimination, targeting and lack of transparency.
- The U.S. lacks a federal biometric data law. While some states like Illinois and California have protections, others, including New York, have inconsistent or limited regulations, leaving gaps in consumer protection.
- A June article by the New York State Bar Association urges lawmakers to address these issues, warning that unchecked deployment of facial recognition poses serious risks to civil liberties and privacy.
(Natural News)—Biometric surveillance is no longer confined to airports, border checkpoints or high-security zones. Increasingly, it is being tested and normalized on fairways, courts and stadium concourses across the United States.
At this year’s U.S. Open in Oakmont, Pennsylvania, the United States Golf Association (USGA) has quietly expanded the use of facial recognition for event entry, once again partnering with British tech firm FortressGB and facial authentication company Wicket. Spectators now have the option to register their face ahead of time and glide through entry points without presenting a physical ticket for a “frictionless” experience.
However, critics warned that this framing, selling biometric scanning as a mere convenience, masks a more complex and unsettling shift: the normalization of facial surveillance in public leisure spaces, where expectations of anonymity and privacy have traditionally been higher.
The golf tournament isn’t alone in its embrace of this trend. On the other side of the country, the National Basketball Association’s (NBA’s) Los Angeles Clippers are preparing to open the doors of their futuristic new home, the Intuit Dome, with a more comprehensive data-driven approach.
Managed by Halo Sports and Entertainment, a company owned by former Microsoft CEO and Clippers chairman Steve Ballmer, the venue doesn’t just scan faces for entry. It tracks sound levels at individual seats to reward enthusiastic fans, uses facial recognition to personalize welcome screens and continuously gathers behavioral data under the promise of enhancing the fan experience.
Both cases reflect a growing pattern in American sports: venues are becoming testbeds for cutting-edge surveillance technologies, all under the guise of improving speed, security and personalization. Yet as these systems become more embedded, the long-term consequences, especially related to data privacy and civil liberties, remain unresolved.
NYSBA warns the public about facial recognition’s lack of regulation
An article published by the New York State Bar Association (NYSBA) this June warned the public about the growing use of facial recognition technology at entertainment venues.
This piece, written by Kylie Ruff, a 2025 graduate from St. John’s University School of Law, explores how venues across the country are increasingly turning to facial recognition to streamline security and entry. However, he argued that it raises deep questions about privacy, fairness and the balance between safety and surveillance.
For instance, in 2019, pop star Taylor Swift’s security team used facial scanning kiosks at her concert venues to track known stalkers – a move that sparked alarm when it was revealed that the scans had been conducted without fans’ knowledge or consent.
Recently, Madison Square Garden (MSG) Entertainment faced backlash for using facial recognition to ban lawyers from firms engaged in litigation against the company. One mother was barred from seeing the Rockettes with her daughter solely because she worked at a law firm that had a pending case with MSG. None of these exclusions stemmed from criminal history, only affiliations and criticisms.
These practices, Ruff suggested, tread dangerously close to weaponizing surveillance tools for personal or corporate retaliation, without meaningful oversight or accountability. (Related: Malfunctioning facial recognition technology may put innocent individuals at risk.)
Moreover, the U.S. has no comprehensive regulation governing the collection, storage or use of biometric data, including facial recognition scans. Only a handful of states, including Illinois and California, have enacted laws requiring businesses to either obtain consent or offer opt-out mechanisms. While New York City has rules requiring biometric disclosure in commercial settings, the state lacks a uniform approach.
FutureTech.news has more stories on the dystopian measures of governments to surveil citizens. Watch the video below that talks about government agencies that were caught lying about the facial recognition program.
More related stories:
- Irish government to legalize retrospective facial recognition technology.
- Russia to launch nationwide facial recognition payment system this year.
- Mastercard rolls out payment system that uses FACIAL RECOGNITION technology.
- Half of America already in law enforcement’s facial recognition network.
- U.K.’s Crime and Policing Bill 2025 reignites facial recognition controversy.
Sources include:
Why One Survival Food Company Shines Above the Rest
Let’s be real. “Prepper Food” or “Survival Food” is generally awful. The vast majority of companies that push their cans, bags, or buckets desperately hope that their customers never try them and stick them in the closet or pantry instead. Why? Because if the first time they try them is after the crap hits the fan, they’ll be too shaken to call and complain about the quality.
It’s true. Most long-term storage food is made with the cheapest possible ingredients with limited taste and even less nutritional value. This is why they tout calories so much. Sure, they provide calories but does anyone really want to go into the apocalypse with food their family can’t stand?
This is what prompted the Llewellyns to launch Heaven’s Harvest. They bought survival food from multiple companies and determined they couldn’t imagine being stuck in an extended emergency with such low-quality food. They quickly discovered that freeze drying food for long-term storage doesn’t have to mean sacrificing flavor, consistency, or nutrition.
Their ingredients are all-American. In fact, they’re locally sourced and all-natural! This allows their products to be the highest quality on the market, so good that their customers often break open a bag in a pinch to eat because they want to, not just because they have to due to an emergency.
At Heaven’s Harvest, their only focus is amazing food. They don’t sell bugout bags, solar chargers, or multitools. They have one mission – feeding Americans in times of crisis.
What they DO offer is the ability for people to thrive in times of greatest need. On top of long-term storage food, they offer seeds to help Americans for the truly long-term. They want them to grow their own food if possible which is why they offer only Heirloom, Non-GMO, Non-Hybrid, Open-Pollinated seeds so their customers can build permanent food security on their own property.
