Imagine someone told you this: “There’s a sport in which players take a bat and try to hit a ball that’s pitched to them. They run around the three bases and if they can get back to home plate before being tagged out, then their team earns a run. Some people call this ‘baseball,’ but I don’t think it is.”
That’s the vibe from a recent interview with Anthony Fauci. He admitted to supporting the textbook definition of gain-of-function research, then denied that it was gain-of-function research.
According to Breitbart:
Fauci stated, [relevant remarks begin around 1:12:35] “There [are] a number of experiments that need to be done on viruses. How are you going to know whether or not they’re capable of infecting humans unless you examine them? Which means doing something under certain circumstances that make a pathogen more transmissible or more pathogenic, which some people refer to as gain of function.”
Corporate media said nothing, of course, but confusingly neither did many in conservative or alternative media.
Breitbart covered it briefly. Natural News did a story on it (below). But otherwise, I haven’t seen much from the right side of the media fence, echoing the silence that’s expectedly coming from the left side.
Let’s call it what it is. Fauci and his cohorts in and out of the NAIAD participated in or funded gain-of-function research. Chances are extremely high that this research resulted in Covid-19.
It’s no wonder that Fauci and Friends have been so adamant about blaming Covid on bat soup or whatever the excuse du jour is. They know what they did and they realize if the public found out, they’d be in big trouble.
Unfortunately, the public is not likely to find out definitively because even admissions like the one he made last week aren’t drawing enough attention. He has been very bad at slipping up and reversing himself over the past three years. Perhaps journalists have just become accustomed to it and don’t think it’s a big deal. Or maybe they’re just jaded by the lack of redemption that’s come to those who have been screaming about it for months or even years. Whatever the reason, this “buried bombshell” is likely to remain buried along with the other mountains of evidence that our own government participated in launching the pandemic.
Here’s the article by Belle Carter at Natural News explaining the Fauci situation further:
Fauci CONFIRMS Gain-of-Function Research Conducted on Pathogen Blamed for COVID-19 Pandemic
Infectious diseases expert Dr. Anthony Fauci has confirmed that gain-of-function research was indeed performed on pathogen behind the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic.
The former National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) director made the confirmation during the March 21 edition of “American Masters” on PBS.
“How are you going to know whether or not they’re capable of infecting humans unless you examine them? Which means doing something under certain circumstances that make a pathogen more transmissible or more pathogenic, which some people refer to as gain of function,” Fauci explained (Related: Rep. Jim Jordan: Fauci prioritized gain-of-function research, concealed real origin of COVID-19.)
However, Fauci was adamant that the gain-of-function research behind COVID-19 did not happen at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in Wuhan, China. The infectious disease expert also denounced Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) for “insidiously” questioning the work done at the WIV.
“They’ve looked at various grants and they make something of it that it isn’t,” Fauci said. “The microbe [the WIV was] working on, not only was not SARS-CoV-2, it would be molecularly impossible for them to turn it into SARS-CoV-2.”
Fauci, Bowser rebuked while touring DC neighborhood
A section of “American Masters” showed Fauci and Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser visiting the neighborhood of Anacostia in June 2021. The two officials went house to house in the neighborhood to encourage residents to get the COVID-19 vaccine.
In a voice-over recorded prior to the visit, Fauci explained that Anacostia is a historically marginalized Black area with low determinants of health, poor access to care and high rates of COVID-19 cases and vaccine hesitancy as a result.
“They’re sort of the disenfranchised group that we’ve got to reach out to,” he said.
While some of the locals warmly received Fauci and Bowser, some had hesitations with getting vaccinated and peppered them with questions. But one man unloaded on both officials.
“The people in America are not settled with the information that’s been given to us right now,” the Anacostia resident pointed out, alleging that the the number of COVID-19 deaths is manipulated by the federal government.
“It’s about inciting fear in people. You attack people with fear. That’s what this pandemic is – fear.”
Fauci and his party eventually left, failing to convince the man to get the COVID-19 vaccine. The man explained that he would not take in “vaccines that were developed in a short span of time.”
Michael Kantor, executive producer of the “American Masters,” said: “Dr. Fauci is a very controversial figure, and there are going to be people who are going to voice – just as in the film – great displeasure about what he’s done and about his approach to things. But isn’t that the whole point of public media? It is intended to make that conversation happen in the best possible way.”
Not when there is censorship. But that’s another story.
Visit FauciTruth.com for more stories about the infectious disease expert and erstwhile government official.
Watch the exchange between the Anacostia resident and Fauci’s group below.
This video is from The Prisoner channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- THREE YEARS LATE: Energy Department finally concludes that COVID probably came from a Chinese lab.
- ReFounding America: COVID-19 and AIDS pandemics under Fauci’s watch share similarities – Brighteon.TV.
- Gain-of-function means bioweapon: Musk blasts Fauci for overseeing creation of COVID-19.
- Oversight on Fauci’s part allowed gain-of-function experiments in Wuhan to continue.
- Twitter slaps down Project Veritas moments after exposing major Fauci “gain of function” research lie with ban from platform.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
