(Daily Signal)—Years of policy failures, bookended by insufficient preparation in the days leading up to the California wildfires, laid the groundwork for historic destruction, former California state Rep. Mike Gatto says.
“When the history of these fires are written, people will conclude that it was 25% the weather and 75% incompetence and poor management,” the Democratic ex-lawmaker told The Daily Signal at his Palos Verdes, Calif., home.
The fires resulted from a perfect storm of strong winds, overgrown brush, and dry conditions due to a lack of rain for nine months, Gatto said, but poor preparation and slow reaction time from local, city, and state officials, among them Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and Gov. Gavin Newsom, allowed the fire to reach such devastating proportions.
More than 12,000 homes, businesses, schools, and other structures have been destroyed since the fires ignited on Jan. 7. More than 40,000 acres have burned, and at least 24 people have died.
“They just were slow to realize the magnitude and scope and severity of these fires, which resulted in delayed reactions to do certain things,” Gatto said, “whether it’s dispatching certain personnel or making certain requests for different governments to help California.”
Gatto served in the California legislature as a Democrat from 2010 to 2016. He now practices law and serves as a captain in the California Guard.
Part of Gatto’s former district burned in the Eaton fire. He said more than 200 of his and wife’s friends lost their homes.
He criticized elected leaders for dodging responsibility for failures related to the wildfires. While the weather and lack of precipitation is out of anyone’s control, Gatto said people such as Newsom and Bass fail to recognize that “the buck stops with them,” as former President Harry Truman once said.
“I believe in a conception of a government where you do try to take responsibility for the things in your control,” he said. “And those things include everything from response time to making sure that the region is prepared to informing the public of evacuation routes.”
On Jan. 3, four days before the fires started, the National Weather Service issued a warning of a “life-threatening, destructive, widespread windstorm” the afternoon of Tuesday, Jan. 7. Yet Southern California was ill-prepared for the fires.
“When you think about the four days’ warning that we had, I think the question should not be, ‘Gee, how do these different leaders blame other people?’” he said. “But the question for those leaders would be, ‘What would you have done differently during those four days?’”
In hindsight, the government should have posted personnel at evacuation routes, dropped proactive fire retardant on buildings, and removed highly flammable dry brush prior to the fires, he said.
“This is not about Democrats or Republicans,” Gatto said. “This is not about scoring political points. This is about telling the truth. This is about making sure that our society learns from the mistakes that we made, so that this type of thing never happens again.”
The public is desperate for answers about the past week’s epic losses of life and property, but elected officials grandstand through press conferences while those most affected don’t even have the electric power or internet service to tune in.
“It’s not about scoring points. It’s not about showing up at a fire scene and trying to make it look like you care,” Gatto said. “It’s about making the hard decisions about what we need to do as a California society to improve things so that I don’t have to hear about 200 friends of mine who have lost their homes.”
Californians are angry about the crime rates, homelessness crisis, and wildfire management, he said.
“I don’t know if that is going to spark a change with the voters, with the electorate,” he said. “One would have thought that we were starting to see some of that anger in the 2024 elections. So it’s entirely possible that this anger does bleed into 2025.”
Lenient penalties instilled confidence in the criminals who have committed arson, worsening the fires, and looted evacuated homes, Gatto said. Two have been arrested and charged with arson near the wildfires.
“Is it possible that our lenient laws and our lack of ability to do something about the homelessness problem has contributed to these fires?” Gatto mused. “And I think if we’re looking in the mirror, and we’re answering honestly, the answer has to be yes.”
The laws on looting and theft in California have been weak for the past decade, Gatto said, giving criminals the message that such crimes would be tolerated. Though the laws were recently changed, it takes a while for criminals to get the message that crime is unacceptable.
The political angles on the fires are heartbreaking for the former lawmaker and don’t help a grieving public, he said.
“I saw [Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.] tweet that these fires were a reason why climate change, blah, blah, blah,” he said. “I mean, this basin has burned since before there were cars. And one of the worst wildfires was in the 1960s, before people talked about the concept of climate change.”
“The question for officials is, ‘What are you going to do about it?’” he said. “Climate change is not an excuse. It is not something that absolves our officials from good planning and good execution. So, I get very upset when I see people from either side of the aisle use these fires as a way to score political points.”
The scarcity of clean water for wildfire victims is a highlight of the past week’s failures, Gatto said.
“It makes me feel like we’re living in a Third World country,” he said. “My friends in the Altadena area were told that they could not drink their tap water, even if they boiled it, that their tap water was so dangerous that they could not even shower in it.”
While many were able to drive to nearby cities to buy bottled water, elderly people and poor people who don’t have cars couldn’t access drinkable water.
“People did not have drinking water in 2025, in the biggest and wealthiest city in California,” he said. “That is something that to me is just really, really hard for me to accept.”
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Why Bullion Beats Numismatics and Collectible for Your Safe or IRA
Precious metals continue to attract Americans seeking reliable ways to protect their wealth amid inflation, geopolitical risks, and stock market swings. Whether stored in a home safe or held inside a self-directed IRA, physical gold and silver deliver tangible value that paper or digital assets often lack. Yet investors must choose carefully between bullion—pure bars and coins valued mainly for their metal content—and numismatics or collectibles, where rarity, history, and collector demand heavily influence pricing.
Advisor Bullion serves as a dependable source for straightforward, high-quality bullion. The company specializes in physical gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, emphasizing transparent pricing and products that deliver maximum metal content for every dollar spent. This approach makes it ideal for both personal holdings and retirement accounts.
Bullion consists of refined precious metals in standard forms like one-ounce coins (American Gold Eagles, Silver Eagles, Canadian Maple Leafs) or bars. Their value tracks closely to the current spot price of the metal. A typical gold bullion coin trades near the live gold spot price plus a small premium. This structure keeps costs clear and predictable.
Numismatic coins and collectibles add substantial value from factors such as age, rarity, minting errors, or historical significance. A pre-1933 U.S. gold coin or graded proof piece can carry premiums of 30%, 50%, or even 200% above melt value. While this appeals to hobbyists, it creates complexity. Pricing depends on subjective grading, collector trends, and auction results instead of daily spot prices.
For investors focused on wealth preservation and retirement security rather than building a collection, bullion often delivers better results.
Lower Costs and Better Liquidity for Home Storage
When keeping metals in a home safe or private vault, liquidity and efficiency count. Bullion offers clear benefits:
- You acquire more actual gold or silver per dollar invested. Numismatics divert a large share of your money into rarity premiums and massive sales commission, reducing your metal exposure.
- Selling bullion involves tight bid-ask spreads, so you recover nearly full spot value with minimal fees. Collectibles require finding the right buyer and may sell at a discount if demand for that specific item weakens.
- Bullion prices remain transparent and update with global spot markets. You can track gold near current levels or silver accordingly and know exactly where your holdings stand. Numismatic values are priced by the Gold IRA companies with hefty margins applied.
- Standardized coins and bars store efficiently and divide easily for partial sales. Rare coins often need protective slabs and controlled conditions, adding hassle and expense.
- Bullion enjoys worldwide acceptance. A 1-oz Gold Maple Leaf or Silver Eagle sells quickly to dealers anywhere. Niche numismatic pieces may appeal only to limited buyers, slowing liquidation when speed matters.
In times when quick access to value becomes important, bullion’s simplicity stands out.
Stronger Fit for Precious Metals IRAs
Precious metals IRAs continue gaining traction as investors diversify retirement portfolios beyond stocks and bonds. IRS rules permit certain bullion products in self-directed IRAs if they meet purity standards (.995 fine for gold, .999 for silver) and are held by an approved custodian. Eligible items include American Gold and Silver Eagles plus many generic bars and rounds from recognized mints.
Numismatic and most collectible coins generally face heavy scrutiny from custodians due to valuation disputes and elevated markups. These higher premiums mean less actual metal ends up working inside the account.
Bullion avoids these issues. Its value links directly to verifiable spot prices, which simplifies reporting and lowers the risk of regulatory challenges. More of your IRA contribution purchases real metal instead of dealer profits or speculative upside. Over time, owning additional ounces that appreciate with the metal itself can create meaningful outperformance compared with high-premium alternatives that deliver fewer ounces.
Regulatory guidance from the CFTC and state securities offices repeatedly cautions against aggressive sales of expensive numismatics or “semi-numismatic” coins for IRAs. For retirement planning, transparent bullion from established providers reduces risk and aligns better with long-term goals.
How to Get Started with Bullion
Begin by clarifying your goals. Are you protecting savings in a safe, or moving part of a retirement account into a precious metals IRA? Focus on the number of ounces you can acquire at current prices rather than chasing marked-up collectibles.
Diversify sensibly: use gold for core preservation and silver for its blend of industrial and monetary qualities. Mix coins for easier divisibility with bars for lower per-ounce costs on larger buys. Arrange secure storage—whether at home with proper insurance or through professional facilities.
As economic uncertainties linger and faith in conventional assets erodes, bullion continues proving its worth as a dependable store of value. Its direct approach avoids the hype that sometimes surrounds collectible markets and keeps the focus on the metal itself.
For investors prepared to strengthen their portfolios, Advisor Bullion supplies the expertise and selection needed to acquire high-quality bullion efficiently. Whether building personal holdings or integrating metals into an IRA, their emphasis on transparent, investment-grade products helps secure more ounces today that support greater financial security tomorrow. In a complicated financial landscape, bullion’s clarity and reliability make it the smarter foundation for protecting what matters most.
