- U.S. Border Patrol obtained a memo revealing that Mexican drug cartels have authorized the use of weaponized drones to attack agents and law enforcement officers along the Rio Grande Valley.
- The use of weaponized drones represents a significant escalation in cartel tactics, indicating a shift towards more advanced and asymmetrical warfare strategies.
- The State Department has issued a Level Four travel advisory for Tamaulipas, Mexico, due to the increasing presence of improvised explosive devices (IEDs) constructed using common mining explosives.
- Gun battles between U.S. Border Patrol and the Cartel del Noreste near Fronton, Texas, have intensified, with recent incidents involving gunfire from the Mexican side of the border.
- The federal government must take decisive action to address this threat by strengthening border security, designating cartels as terrorist organizations, and providing law enforcement with the necessary resources to combat these sophisticated criminal networks.
(Natural News)—The southern border of the United States has long been a battleground, but a chilling new development has escalated the stakes to unprecedented levels. According to a U.S. Border Patrol memo obtained by Newsmax, Mexican drug cartels have authorized the use of weaponized drones to attack Border Patrol agents and law enforcement officers along the Rio Grande Valley. This alarming revelation underscores the growing sophistication and audacity of transnational criminal organizations, posing a direct threat to American sovereignty and national security.
A new frontier in cartel warfare
The internal memo, dated January 31, 2025, warns agents to exercise extreme caution as intelligence indicates cartels are deploying drones equipped with explosives. The memo highlights heightened activity near Fronton, Texas, where recent gun battles between U.S. Border Patrol and the Cartel del Noreste have intensified.
“This is a major increase in threat to the United States, and it’s specifically in the southern region where we’ve been talking about recently,” reported Jaeson Jones of Newsmax. “We’ve had a lot of gun battles between the U.S. Border Patrol and Cartel del Noreste near Fronton, Texas.”
The use of weaponized drones represents a significant escalation in cartel tactics. Historically, cartels have relied on smuggling, kidnapping and armed confrontations to maintain their grip on power. However, the adoption of drone technology signals a shift toward more advanced and asymmetrical warfare tactics, mirroring strategies employed by terrorist organizations in conflict zones like the Middle East.
Explosives and IEDs: A growing menace
The threat extends beyond drones. The State Department has issued a Level Four travel advisory for Tamaulipas, the Mexican state bordering Texas, warning U.S. government personnel and citizens to avoid the region due to the increasing presence of improvised explosive devices (IEDs). These devices have been discovered in cities such as Reynosa, Rio Bravo, Valle Hermoso and San Fernando.
“As a precaution, U.S. government employees have been ordered to avoid all travel in and around Reynosa and Rio Bravo outside of daylight hours and to avoid dirt roads throughout Tamaulipas,” the advisory states.
Cartels have long used Tovex, a common mining explosive, to construct IEDs. “They’ve been using this kind of explosive going back to 2010,” Jones explained. “The reason is because you can get it all over. They use it to make roads. They use it for mining.”
The deployment of IEDs and weaponized drones underscores the cartels’ ability to adapt and innovate, posing a direct challenge to U.S. law enforcement and border security efforts.
Gun battles and cartel aggression
The situation on the ground remains volatile. On January 27, U.S. Border Patrol agents exchanged gunfire with suspected cartel members near Fronton, Texas. A gunshot was fired from the Mexican side of the border, prompting agents to return fire. Fortunately, no Border Patrol agents were injured.
Lt. Chris Olivarez of the Texas Department of Public Safety shared footage of the incident on social media, stating, “DPS Drone Operators captured the gunmen fleeing Mexico due to military presence, & seeking refuge on an island between the U.S. & Mexico. The State of Texas will continue to monitor the area closely & use every resource available to prevent transnational threats to our law enforcement partners & the homeland.”
The area, known as “Cartel Island,” has become a hotspot for cartel activity. “Being fired on by the cartel is not necessarily unprecedented,” reported NewsNation’s Ali Bradley. “Unfortunately, my agents are texting me saying, ‘Unfortunately, we’re used to that.’”
Historical context: A border in crisis
The escalation of cartel violence is not an isolated incident but the culmination of years of failed policies and lax enforcement. During the Trump administration, efforts were made to designate Mexican drug cartels as terrorist organizations, a move that would have provided additional tools to combat their operations. However, the current administration has yet to follow through on this critical step.
The cartels’ billion-dollar drug trade fuels their ability to arm themselves with advanced weaponry and technology. As Art Del Cueto, vice president of the National Border Patrol Council, noted, “The violence is going to go on because it’s a billion-dollar industry; they gotta keep their money.”
A call to action
The use of weaponized drones and IEDs by cartels represents a clear and present danger to U.S. national security. It is imperative that the federal government takes decisive action to address this threat. Strengthening border security, designating cartels as terrorist organizations, and providing law enforcement with the resources they need to combat these sophisticated criminal networks must be top priorities.
As President Donald Trump recently told House Republicans, “I focus on the border more than anything else.” In light of these developments, it is clear that the American people must demand the same level of focus and urgency from their leaders. The safety of our border agents and the security of our nation depend on it.
The southern border is no longer just a line on a map—it is a frontline in a new era of cross-border warfare. The time to act is now, before the next drone strike or IED explosion claims American lives.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
- Hand-curated links from conservative and Christian sites — NO legacy media garbage links. Patriots get their news every day at JDRucker.com
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
