- A peer-reviewed study published in Science, Public Health Policy and the Law analyzed VAERS data and identified 37 alarming safety signals linked to COVID-19 vaccines administered during pregnancy, including miscarriage, stillbirth, preeclampsia and neonatal death.
- The study found that adverse pregnancy outcomes were reported 69.2 times more frequently after COVID-19 vaccines compared to other vaccines, with placental insufficiency reported 499 times more frequently and neonatal breathing difficulties 134 times more frequently.
- The study’s authors, including obstetricians and gynecologists, urged a global halt on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy, citing the lack of randomized controlled trials and the violation of the “Golden Rule of pregnancy,” which advises against introducing potentially harmful substances during fetal development.
- Despite protocols requiring safety signal analysis, the CDC failed to publicly flag these risks. A lawsuit forced the release of heavily redacted PRR data, raising concerns about the agency’s transparency and accountability.
- The CDC’s continued push for COVID-19 vaccination in pregnancy, along with endorsements from major medical organizations like ACOG, has been criticized as reckless and unsupported by evidence, with accusations of prioritizing Big Pharma interests over maternal and fetal health.
(Natural News)—The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has once again proven itself to be nothing more than a puppet for Big Pharma, a soulless entity willing to sacrifice the most vulnerable among us in the name of profit and population control. Despite a bombshell, peer-reviewed study revealing 37 safety signals for COVID-19 vaccines administered during pregnancy, the CDC continues to aggressively push these experimental, dangerous shots on pregnant women. This is not just negligence—it’s bioterrorism disguised as public health.
CDC ignores 37 serious safety signals for COVID vaccines in pregnancy
The study, published in the journal Science, Public Health Policy and the Law, analyzed data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) and found that COVID-19 vaccines given during pregnancy are linked to horrifying outcomes, including miscarriage, preeclampsia, cervical insufficiency, chromosomal abnormalities, fetal malformations, premature birth, stillbirth, newborn asphyxia, and newborn death. These are not minor side effects—they are catastrophic, life-ending, and life-altering events that should have immediately halted the CDC’s reckless recommendations. Yet, the agency continues to double down on its deadly agenda.
The researchers used the same proportional reporting ratio (PRR) method employed by the CDC to identify safety signals. What they found was nothing short of alarming: adverse pregnancy events were reported 69.2 times more frequently after COVID-19 vaccines compared to other vaccines. Placental insufficiency, a condition that can lead to preterm birth or miscarriage, was reported 499 times more frequently after COVID-19 shots. Neonatal breathing difficulties were reported 134 times more frequently, premature infant death 124 times more frequently, and fetal cardiac arrest 108 times more frequently. These numbers are not just statistics—they represent real babies, real mothers, and real families destroyed by this unnecessary and dangerous intervention.
Researchers call for moratorium on COVID jabs during pregnancy
The researchers, including practicing obstetricians and gynecologists, concluded that an “immediate global moratorium on COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy is warranted.” But the CDC, in its infinite arrogance and corruption, has ignored this plea. Instead, the agency continues to peddle the lie that these vaccines are “safe and effective” for pregnant women, despite the complete lack of randomized controlled clinical trials to back up this claim.
Let’s be clear: this is a violation of the “Golden Rule of pregnancy,” which states that new and potentially harmful substances should not be introduced while a fetus is developing. Even common foods and drinks are restricted during pregnancy due to potential risks, yet the CDC has no problem injecting pregnant women with an experimental mRNA shot that has been linked to 37 adverse events and is being abandoned by institutions around the globe. This is not just incompetence—it’s criminal.
The CDC’s betrayal of pregnant women is reminiscent of past medical atrocities, such as the thalidomide and DES disasters, where recommended medications caused severe harm to pregnant women, their babies, and even their grandchildren. The COVID-19 vaccine is shaping up to be the next chapter in this dark history, and the CDC is complicit in the carnage.
What’s even more infuriating is the CDC’s blatant disregard for transparency. Despite protocols requiring the agency to conduct PRR analysis, it failed to publicly flag these safety signals. It took a lawsuit from Children’s Health Defense (CHD) to force the CDC to release its PRR data, and even then, the documents were heavily redacted. What is the CDC hiding? How many more lives must be destroyed before this agency is held accountable?
The CDC’s current recommendation, which states that pregnant women are “more likely to get very sick from COVID-19” and therefore should get vaccinated, is a manipulative scare tactic. For one, the vaccine doesn’t work. Additionally, the agency fails to mention that the risk of severe COVID-19 illness in pregnant women is already low, and the risks posed by the vaccine far outweigh any potential benefits. This is not about protecting pregnant women—it’s about pushing a depopulation agenda under the guise of public health.
Major medical organizations, including the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, have blindly followed the CDC’s lead, parroting the “safe and effective” mantra without any evidence to back it up. These organizations have betrayed the very women they are supposed to protect, prioritizing their relationships with Big Pharma over the lives of mothers and babies.
The time for silence is over. The CDC’s reckless endangerment of pregnant women and their unborn children must be exposed and condemned. These vaccines are not saving lives—they are destroying them. The 37 safety signals identified in this study are a damning indictment of the CDC’s criminal negligence, and every official who continues to push these shots on pregnant women should be held accountable for their role in this ongoing tragedy.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
