JD Rucker
  • Home
  • About JD Rucker
    • Find Me
    • Shows
    • Contact
  • Prepare
    • Long-Term Storage Food
    • The Only Gold Company I Recommend
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About JD Rucker
    • Find Me
    • Shows
    • Contact
  • Prepare
    • Long-Term Storage Food
    • The Only Gold Company I Recommend
No Result
View All Result
JD Rucker
No Result
View All Result
Home Opinions
Gavin Newsom

Gavin Newsom VETOES Parent Trans-Affirming Bill… Which Means He’s Running for President

War with the trans-supremacy cult is only worth it to Newsom if he has the Oval Office in his sights.

by JD Rucker
September 23, 2023
in Opinions
Reading Time: 2 mins read

  • Preparedness: Don’t Forget the Meds

In a shocking move that pretty much nobody saw coming, California Governor Gavin Newsom vetoed AB 957, the trans-supremacy bill that would have forced parents to “affirm” their children’s DNA-denying mental illness or risk having the state take them away.

This means one thing: He is keeping the door open to running for president.

Parasites Ivermectin Mebendazole

According to his memo to California State Assembly members, which was conspicuously dropped very late on Friday, Newsom said:

I am returning Assembly Bill 957 without my signature.

This legislation would require a court, when determining the best interests of a child in a child custody or visitation proceeding, to consider, among other comprehensive factors, a parent’s affirmation of the child’s gender identity or gender expression.

I appreciate the passion and values that led to the author to introduce this bill. I share a deep commitment to advancing the rights of transgender Californians, an effort that has guided my decisions through many decades in public office.

That said, I urge caution when the Executive and Legislative branches of state government attempt to dictate — in prescriptive terms that single out one characteristic — legal standards for the Judicial branch to apply. Other-minded elected officials, in California and other states, could very well use this strategy to diminish the civil rights of vulnerable communities.

Moreover, a court, under existing law, is required to consider a child’s health, safety, and welfare when determining the best interests of a child in these proceedings, including the parent’s affirmation of the child’s gender identity.

For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill.

🚨Wow🚨

Late on a Friday night, Gavin Newsom just vetoed AB 957, which would have required judges to remove custody of children from parents who don’t “affirm" a child's "gender identity or gender expression.” pic.twitter.com/fXfdYtBNS4

— Greg Price (@greg_price11) September 23, 2023

In essence, his excuse for going against his party is twofold. First, signing the bill means Republicans will go after trans-kids. Second, it’s not necessary since judges are supposed to consider gender affirmation already.

These excuses are hogwash. He knows signing the bill would be the kiss of death for any current or future presidential ambitions. It would hang over him for the remainder of his career, marking him as the radical governor who took kids away from parents because they didn’t trust their eight-year-old’s conclusions based on confusion. And whenever a child becomes an adult who goes public with regrets of being allowed to transition, Newsom would get the blame.

The only reason bills like AB 957 exist is because every Democrat lawmaker — and a growing number of RINOs — fall into one of two categories. They either pander in every way possible to the trans-supremacy cult or they go along with the agenda to keep from being targeted. In other words, they’re either brainwashed or terrified. Or both.

China controls 90% of all pharmaceutical ingredients used in the US. Don’t wait for the supply chain to break or for pharmacies to run out. Stock up on long-term storage antibiotics and prescription meds with Jase.

For Newsom to quietly but unavoidably declare war against the cult means he’s willing to risk the repercussions rather than pull his name from the presidential hat. It also tells us that he’s likely looking at 2024; someone as egotistical as Newsom would probably believe he could overcome fallout from signing the bill with a four-year gap.

He’s running. If he wasn’t, he would have signed the bill and further endeared himself to the trans-supremacy cult. But running afoul of them today is less important to him than ending his presidential aspirations forever.

What do you think? Sound off on my Substack.


The JD Rucker Show — Rumble — X (Twitter) — YouTube


Bypass Big Tech Censors


Tags: CaliforniaElection 2024Gavin NewsomLedeStickyTop StoryTransgender

Related Posts

Bill Gates India
Opinions

Mutant Rice and Bill Gates’s Lab Rats: Grand Experiments in India’s Fields

May 12, 2025
WWIII
Opinions

This Week Will Begin a Process That Will either Lead to Peace or World War 3

May 12, 2025
Prayer
Opinions

A Matter of Faith Worldwide

May 11, 2025
Next Post
AI Rand Paul

AI-Generated Image of Rand Paul Is So Realistic, Many Believed He Showed Up to the Senate Barefoot in a Bathrobe

Jesus Ayala

Vegas Teen Jesus Ayala... White?

James O'Keefe

In One Short Tweet, James O'Keefe Delivers the Warning We All Need to Hear Right Now

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

JD Rucker

© 2025 JD Rucker - Ephesians 6:12

Navigate Site

  • About JD Rucker
  • Contact

Follow Me

No Result
View All Result
  • Home

© 2025 JD Rucker - Ephesians 6:12

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00

Queue

Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00