JD Rucker
  • Home
  • About JD Rucker
    • Find Me
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About JD Rucker
    • Find Me
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
JD Rucker
No Result
View All Result
Home News

NATO May Actually Pay Its Fair Share as Trump Turns Up the Heat

by Wallace White, DCNF
June 6, 2025
in News
Reading Time: 3 mins read
NATO

DCNF(DCNF)—European NATO countries are feeling the heat from Washington to increase their defense spending, and they may be inclined to give President Donald Trump what he wants, according to Bloomberg News.

NATO is preparing to host a summit later in June to discuss how to increase their defense spending as the Trump administration pushes Europe to pull its own weight in the defense of the continent, Bloomberg reported. In 2024, 22 NATO members were projected to meet the standard 2% of GDP defense spending target, but the Trump administration is now pushing for 5%, a figure which Europe may be prepared to agree to given pressures like the war in Ukraine.

Christian and Conservative news hand-curated the way it’s supposed to be. Stay full-MAGA despite the so-called “civil war” waged by the Islam-loving “woke right”.

“Let me cut to the core of our message: 5%,” U.S. ambassador to NATO Matthew Whitaker told reporters in Brussels, according to Bloomberg. “This is not going to be just a pledge, it’s going to be a commitment.”

In 2024, the nations that fell below the 2% threshold were Croatia, Portugal, Italy, Canada, Belgium, Luxembourg, Slovenia and Spain, according to the Atlantic Council. The current 5% figure is split up into 3.5% of GDP spent on typical defense expenditures and 1.5% spending on security-related projects, like cyber warfare and intelligence, according to Reuters.

“I don’t really care how much they spend. It could be 5%, it could be 10%, it could be 2o%,” Jennifer Kavanaugh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “My view is that the goal should be self-sufficiency, and that the administration, instead of focusing on this 5% target, should be pushing Europe to think about what it needs to defend itself on its own, and be less involved in the specifics of what that entails.”

Kavanaugh believes that while the specifics need to be worked out during talks, Europe certainly has to spend more if it hopes to be able to stand alone and stop relying on the U.S.

“They do need more, but I still think it’s the right way to go about it,” Kavanaugh told the DCNF.

Some European leaders have been rallying support to spend more on defense, with French President Emmanuel Macron becoming a prominent figure in the push.

Advisor Bullion Surge

“This is important, and this is something you have to realize as well. Because Russia is still a threat. Russia spends 10% of its GDP in defense. It’s close to us, and Russia is aggressive vis-à-vis the Europeans. We have, every week, cyber attacks. We had terrorist attacks,” Macron said during a Fox News Interview February 24. “They have a sort of hybrid war vis-à-vis the Europeans. So we have to step up our expenditure.”

The U.S. has so far spent $184.4 billion to aid Ukraine since fiscal year 2022, while Europe in total spent $266 billion as of December 31, 2024, according to the Council on Foreign Relations.

Trump has long advocated for NATO to increase its defense spending, questioning why the U.S. continues to spend billions on European defense for little gain while some European countries are not able to meet the 2% threshold.

The State Department did not respond to the DCNF’s request for comment.

All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].

Bypass Big Tech Censors


Fastest Growing





Two Storms, One Harvest

Empty Shelves

Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.

What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.

Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.

This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.

Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.

Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.

The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running

While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.

The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.

Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.

The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.

Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.

The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?

The System Has No Slack Left

The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.

Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.

There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.

The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.

What Joseph Knew

Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.

Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.

Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.

Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.

None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.

Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.

Tags: Daily Caller News FoundationLedeNATOStickyTop Story

Related Posts

News

‘This Is the Most Dangerous Interview I Have Ever Done’: Dr. James Thorp on the Fauci Diary and the Missing Births

September 13, 2026
News

A List of Evidence Consistent With the Hypothesis That “Vaccines Cause Autism”

September 13, 2026
News

This 9/11-Related Content Zohran Mamdani Was Caught Posting Is Absolutely Disgusting

September 13, 2026
Next Post
gas-prices

California's Gas Tax Nightmare: Democrats Force $8.44-Per-Gallon Future on Struggling Families

Al-Qaeda

Suspected Al-Qaeda Terrorist Detained by ICE in Philly

Joe Biden

Biden White House Had Third Autopen Signature, Oversight Project Finds

JD Rucker

© 2026 JD Rucker - Ephesians 6:12

Navigate Site

  • About JD Rucker
  • Contact

Follow Me

No Result
View All Result
  • Home

© 2026 JD Rucker - Ephesians 6:12