The wars to come will ultimately pit freedom-loving peoples of many nations against the architecture of the State — composed of the bureaucratic Leviathans at the national and international level, taxpayer-funded news organizations, and the broad spectrum of so-called “non-governmental organizations” whose budgets and personnel nonetheless come directly from government agencies (including foreign and domestic covert intelligence services).
The present War in Ukraine is a throwback to a time that no longer exists — one in which borders meant something. Consider how strange it is to have the European Commission’s unelected President Ursula von der Leyen, the European Union’s boisterous cheerleaders from France and Germany, and the leftist-globalist leaders of residual nations, such as Canada and the United Kingdom, all clamoring about the sanctity of Ukraine’s eastern border, when these various proponents of supranational and international institutions all denounce the nation state as outdated, fascist, and downright yucky.
As Spain has recently demonstrated with its open borders policy of flooding Europe with North Africans, the E.U. is a borderless schizo-continent. Forty years ago, the European Economic Community suckered member states into relinquishing sovereignty over their borders with the first iteration of the Schengen Agreement, and Brussels has used that jurisdictional battering ram as the camel’s nose under the tent to incite unlawful mass migration from Asia, Africa, and the Middle East.
Likewise, Canada has huge immigrant populations from India and China. The United Kingdom grants settlement or citizenship to a fresh-off-the-boat foreigner every single minute, and the number of “boat migrants” who have been resettled into taxpayer-funded digs over the last two years alone is larger than the number of soldiers in the entire British Army.
Now that Democrats have control over the state governments of California, Arizona, New Mexico, and Texas, they will work with their open-borders friends (and Americans’ enemies) in D.C.’s Uniparty to continue the carnage of the Biden presidency, during which the senile, old git resettled twenty million foreigners across the United States.
It is preposterous for Western leaders to cry about Ukrainian sovereignty when they have abandoned any pretense of defending their own nations’ borders. Large parts of the populations of Crimea and the Donbas region identify more with Russia than with Ukraine, but the same meddlesome European Commission whose agents canceled Romania’s presidential election when the “wrong” candidate won (a so-called “Euroskeptic,” egad!) insist that “democracy” exists only when territories bow down to the royal edicts of Brussels Eurocrats.
Fighting over the geographical boundaries of Ukraine when the European Union wishes to dissolve Europe’s national boundaries will succeed in getting a lot of boys and men killed for no purpose greater than the vanity of empire-builders and piss-poor students of world history.
I find it remarkable that the British government is prepping citizens to fight WWIII against the Russian Federation when the United Kingdom looks nothing as it did at the turn of the century. White native Brits have disappeared from the cities, and much of the kingdom has been handed over to third-world immigrants who despise everything about their new home’s history, traditions, and beliefs.
The British Army keep telling the white population (whose ancestors have called the islands home for a thousand or more years) that they will be conscripted to fight a great war within one thousand days, and the white population (who are quickly becoming a minority in their own kingdom) keep telling the British government that they would rather fight the foreign invaders (and their aiders and abettors within the State) than send their sons and daughters (yes, girls will be sacrificed in the years ahead for the “glory” of the globalist ruling class) off to die in drone-exploding trenches.
Why would native Brits die for a nation that no longer exists? From their perspective, the Muslim rape gangs who were never punished for raping hundreds of thousands of British girls clearly have more power than the average white Brit. If the Islamists wish to protect their newly conquered British Isles in some future war, the mosques should send their jihadis off to do the fighting.
It is truly bizarre to hear the globalist politicians in D.C., London, Ottawa, Paris, Berlin, and Brussels speak about coming conflicts as if the world that they are constructing is worth preserving.
I won’t speak for others, but there is no way I will fight a war for “climate change” delusions and expensive “green” energy regulations. I won’t fight for the “rules-based international order.” I won’t fight for online censorship and the criminalization of speech that Western leaders justify as necessary for “protecting children,” combating “disinformation,” and silencing “hate speech” — all ridiculous lies meant to create the “permission structures” for killing free speech.
I won’t fight for open borders. I won’t fight for the idiot ideologues who have taken over the educational system. I won’t fight for globalism’s awful cultural Marxism, its race-based discrimination, or its obsession with both castrating and having sex with children. I won’t fight for Islamic supremacy or the construction of more mosques in once tranquil American towns. I won’t fight for the central banks’ currency debasement and market manipulation.
I have no interest in fighting for that corrupt dwarf-dictator Volodymyr Zelenskyy or his equally corrupt Ukrainian thugs. And I will never fight for the D.C.-London-Brussels Deep State that profits from war by laundering taxpayer money through the meat grinder slaughtering millions in Ukraine and into the bank accounts of family foundations and globalist NGOs.
These are not things for which sane people will lay down their lives.
We fight to protect our families, homes, neighbors, communities, and countries.
The globalist governments that have taken over Western nations insist that they own our children and may “trans” them without our consent. They tax our homes every year, making it impossible to ever completely “own” anything. They resettle foreign invaders into our tight-knit communities and call us “racists” and “bigots” because we prefer to have neighbors who speak our language and share our religion. They refuse to enforce national borders and replace the people whose families built the West with third-world peoples who do nothing but exploit the West.
Why would I fight for the European Union, Canada’s Chinese vassal state, Britain-istan, or D.C.’s imperial Deep State? These cabals offer a vision for the future that is no better than Vladimir Putin’s strongman-controlled Russia or Xi Jinping’s one-party-controlled communist China.
Speaking of China, why is it that European and American globalists bend over backwards to play nice with Xi and his totalitarian police state while taking the juvenile step of banning Russian athletes from international competitions? How can European and American globalists pretend to have any legitimacy when it comes to the so-called battle between “authoritarianism” and “democracy” when they partner with authoritarians all over the world — just not Russia’s.
America’s Founding Fathers had it right. Governments are never the solution; they are always the problem. Both the Declaration of Independence and the U.S. Constitution express the Founders’ firm belief that neither governments nor officeholders can be trusted to do what is right.
If they believed that political leaders were inherently good, the Constitution would be much shorter: Put the most ethical, moral, capable man in charge of the government. Instead, they created an extremely limited federal government, constrained its powers except for those specifically delineated, divided it into three branches, and included checks and balances meant to keep the branches competing against each other.
If the Constitution were a “bottom line up front” memo, its principal conclusion would state at the top: Governments are always corrupt.
Globalist governments believe that Western citizens can be pressured into fighting WWIII. I think WWIII will be fought between Western citizens and globalist governments.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
