(The Epoch Times)—Gov. Gavin Newsom vowed to redraw California’s congressional seats to elect more Democrats if Texas decides to move ahead with redistricting that would favor Republicans, he announced July 25.
Newsom held a press conference after private discussions with Democratic Texas lawmakers about what the governor called an “assault on democracy.”
The California governor, who has hinted at a presidential run in 2028, said he and other Democratic governors across the nation were concerned and have started discussing ways to counteract the actions by Texas and the Trump administration.
“If we don’t put a stake in the heart of this administration, there won’t be an election in 2028,” Newsom said. “We’ve got to fight fire with fire.”
The Texas Legislature opened a special session July 21 to consider redrawing its congressional maps.
Texas Gov. Greg Abbott says his state needs to redraw its districts because of constitutional concerns raised by the U.S. Department of Justice surrounding four Democratic-controlled districts.
A July 7 letter from Assistant U.S. Attorneys General Harmeet Dhillon and Michael Gates of the Civil Rights Division outlines concerns that the state’s Ninth, 18th, 29th, and 33rd congressional districts create unconstitutional “coalition districts,” which run afoul of the Voting Rights Act and the 14th Amendment. Coalition districts combine different minority groups to create a potential majority.
President Donald Trump says redistricting Texas could widen the slim Republican House majority by several more seats.
“I think we get five,” Trump told reporters at the White House on July 15.
Newsom responded to Trump’s claim later that day, stating, “Two can play this game” in a post on X.
Newsom didn’t offer a formal plan to capture more blue House seats, but said he and the Legislature were considering three or four pathways. One of the paths could include asking voters to weigh in on redistricting, Newsom said.
“We are committed to this process,” Newsom said. “This is not a bluff. This is real.”
Texas lawmakers flew out to meet Newsom in Sacramento before the press conference to brief the governor on the situation, according to Texas state Rep. Rafael Anchía, a past chair of the Mexican American legislative caucus. Texas Democrats are already planning several lawsuits to fight the redistricting, according to Anchía.
“We, as Democrats, are going to use every tool in our toolbox to fight this unlawful redistricting,” Anchía told reporters. “Every tool is on the table and we plan on fighting on multiple fronts.”
California’s redistricting occurs every 10 years after the census is complete and is done through an independent commission.
Bonta Is All In
California Attorney General Rob Bonta told CNN’s Jake Tapper on July 24 that he would join Newsom’s effort to redistrict the state if Texas’s plans are approved.
“I would support a lawful approach to blunting and neutralizing the raw and inappropriate exercise of gerrymandering power in Texas,” Bonta said. “We should neutralize any gains they try to seek if we can do it lawfully, and I believe we can.”
Bonta’s team has already met with Newsom’s team, he said.
Bonta said California would seek a “tit for tat” approach. If Texas adds five Republican seats, California will seek to add five Democratic seats.
Bonta has filed 34 lawsuits against the Trump administration in six months over a wide range of policies and actions.
Opposition Calls Newsom’s Plan Illegal
Newsom’s redistricting revenge plan has already raised some eyebrows in the state.
Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.) said Newsom planned to abolish California’s voter-approved commission in an attempt to relegate Republicans to just three seats out of 52 in the state. The move would give Democrats even more power and erase all checks and balances in the state, Kiley claimed.
“Absolute power corrupts absolutely,” Kiley posted on X.
California already has a supermajority of Democrats in the state Legislature, and Democrats fill every elected state seat across the board.
In Congress, the state is represented by two Democratic senators. In the House of Representatives, 43 Democrats and nine Republicans represent the state.
Republicans make up about 40 percent of the state’s voters, but hold only 17 percent of the congressional seats.
Steve Hilton, a commentator and Fox News contributor who is running for governor in 2028, deemed Newsom’s gerrymandering proposal an outrage.
“To be clear, there is NO way for Newsom and Bonta to carry out their outrageous threat ‘lawfully,’” Hilton said in statement. “Newsom and Bonta’s illegal and unconstitutional partisan scheme is a threat to our democracy, and I will do everything in my power to resist it.”
Hilton vowed to take immediate legal action if Newsom and Bonta followed through with their threat.
Hilton said the plan put forward by Newsom and Bonta would violate the California Constitution. In a 1983 Legislature v. Deukmejian decision, the California Supreme Court ruled that redistricting can happen only once per decade after the census and can’t be amended by a voter initiative.
The state would have to pass a constitutional amendment, repeal the once-a-decade redistricting rule, and transfer power back to the Legislature to carry out their plans.
Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.) also noted California had created an independent commission specifically to keep politics out of the process.
“The voters took redistricting power away from the California Legislature in 2010 for a reason,” he posted on X. “They created the Citizens Redistricting Commission to keep partisan politics out of the process, because politicians shouldn’t be allowed to rig the maps to protect their own power.”
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
