Former presidential candidate Vivek Ramaswamy glided to victory in the Ohio GOP primary election for governor, solidifying the predicted Nov. 3 General Election showdown between him and the uncontested Democratic nominee, Dr. Amy Acton.
Ramaswamy defeated a political newcomer, Toledo automotive entrepreneur Casey Putsch. The Associated Press called the race at 7:42 p.m. ET, with Ramaswamy holding a 70-point lead.
Ramaswamy, at a watch party in Columbus, called his margin of victory in the primary “historic.” He also said he believed the results showed that the “Republican Party, coming out of a primary for governor, has never been more united.”
To every Ohioan, he said: “Our pledge to you is that we will deliver you lower costs, bigger paychecks, and better schools.”
Rather than attacking Putsch or responding to his criticisms, Ramaswamy has kept his campaign messaging focused on his agenda—emphasizing his plans to eliminate or reduce taxes—a message that resonated with several Ramaswamy voters whom The Epoch Times interviewed in the Columbus area.
Randy Tarrier, who attended a Ramaswamy town hall in a northern Columbus suburb on May 4, called Ramaswamy “one of the most original candidates that I have seen in a while.”
“I like the fact that he is looking at rolling back income taxes, at least for seniors—and property taxes, possibly for people who have paid off their own homes,” Tarrier said. “So, I think that’s a very good place to start.”
Tarrier’s wife, Debra Tarrier, commented: “He’s so approachable on all different issues. He’s such a smart guy. He’s very successful, and I think he can correct a lot of the issues we’re facing in Ohio.”
Discussion of taxes and affordability policies has dominated messaging for both Ramaswamy and his Democratic opponent, Acton.
Her platform calls for tax credits and tax cuts, her campaign website states, along with lowering health care costs, helping people stay on Medicaid, and forgiving medical debt.
Voters and Ramaswamy have also raised Acton’s prior performance as Ohio’s health director during the COVID-19 pandemic as a significant issue. The divide over Acton’s COVID reaction appears to fall largely along party lines—with Republicans mostly opposing stringent restrictions and Democrats favoring them.
That persistent partisan polarization around COVID—more than six years after the pandemic started—reflects a national trend. Last year, the Pew Research Center found 60 percent of Democrats were then worried that COVID was not being taken seriously enough—a view held by only 20 percent of Republicans at the time.
Acton’s COVID response earned praise from some—including Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican. DeWine cannot run again because of term limits. The incumbent has endorsed Ramaswamy—while still defending Acton, who served in his administration.
Voters in the working-class Columbus area of Driving Park told The Epoch Times they voted for Acton because they liked the way she handled the pandemic.
Janice Wicker, 83, told The Epoch Times she voted for the former health director because “I think she will be fair. She was fair during COVID, and they shut her down because she was telling the truth.”
Acton faced death threats and an armed protest in her front yard over her decision to sign DeWine’s restrictions that kept residents and businesses shuttered for about five weeks.
In the run-up to the primary, both Putsch and Acton described themselves as more relatable for everyday citizens than Ramaswamy, a self-made billionaire.
Ramaswamy’s campaign has responded that he will talk to anyone—and that his business successes prove that he knows how to lead, create jobs, and make wise decisions.
A biotech businessman, Ramaswamy left his role with President Donald Trump’s Department of Government Efficiency to seek the governorship; Trump has endorsed Ramaswamy.
Ramaswamy supporter Sean Chansler, 55, of Dayton, Ohio, told The Epoch Times after a town hall with Ramaswamy: “A politician can tell you this or that, but he’s got a mapped-out plan—and that’s what stood out to me.”
At that event, Ramaswamy emphasized that he disagreed not just with Acton’s COVID policies, but also with her decision-making process.
He argued that Acton should have “had the intellectual curiosity” to investigate: “Does this [virus] affect children differently than old people?” Probing for that answer would have revealed that children were less vulnerable to the virus and therefore could have safely returned to school sooner, Ramaswamy said.
Acton told reporters at an east side Columbus gathering on May 4: “I’m proud of the work we did in COVID, alongside Gov. DeWine, who absolutely was the person in charge.
“He—we—flattened the curve,” she said. Health officials commonly used that phrase in 2020 to describe how complying with rules such as mask-wearing would reduce the rising tide of infections.
“We saved a lot of lives, and we opened earlier, and got back to life sooner, because we took swift and decisive action, working with experts,” Acton said.
Vicki Evans-Long, a nine-year Driving Park resident, commended Acton for her demeanor while handing the COVID crisis. “I think she cared … She was concerned, and that’s what we needed,” the voter told The Epoch Times.
At age 59, Evans-Long said she thinks more about health care policies now. “I’m worried about Medicare, getting closer to retirement,” the voter said.
Jesse Caton, an event planner who stopped by to vote wearing a necktie patterned with Disney cartoon characters, said Acton appeals to him as “someone that’s running for Ohioans and the working-class family—just making sure that … our voices are heard.”
When he met Acton in person a couple of times, Caton said he used those opportunities to express “appreciation for everything that she stood for in COVID.”
After casting his ballot at Harmon Elementary School in Grove City, a suburb just south of Columbus, Ramaswamy voter Mark Shy said he considers himself a political moderate who can see that Acton has some strengths too.
Asked to discuss his voting rationale, Shy said that might seem simple—but it isn’t.
“I’m 72, and it’s confusing now—the whole process. … I don’t trust the process,” Shy said.
He and his peers grew up in the Vietnam War era, which he said was “a time of ‘distrust the government.’”
“And it feels like that more right now,” Shy said.
Being older, “you have a lot of time to walk, and pray, and all those things,” Shy said, which is why he gave more than just a “rah-rah” cheerleader-type answer about his vote.
Shy said Ramaswamy’s tax policies really appeal to him.
As retirees on fixed incomes, he and his wife worry about “being priced out of our home” by taxes, Shy said.
He called Acton a “qualified candidate” because she is a medical doctor, but said, “I just don’t know how much practical application she has.”
Shy, who owned his own general-contracting business, said he has confidence that Ramaswamy’s business experience taught him how to make solid executive-level decisions. He doesn’t have that same level of confidence about Acton.
However, Shy said, “She’s got some points to be made. So I don’t think Ohio loses if she wins.”
Acton, a native of Youngstown, Ohio, chose a running mate with strong ties to Cincinnati—Ramaswamy’s hometown. David Pepper formerly served as a Hamilton County commissioner and Cincinnati city councilman. He also made two unsuccessful attempts to win statewide offices: attorney general and treasurer.
Ramaswamy’s lieutenant governor choice is a man with detailed knowledge of how the state government works in the capital, Columbus: Ohio Senate President Rob McColley.
Ramaswamy’s financial standing enabled him to contribute $25 million toward his campaign. He had almost $31 million on hand after spending about $12.6 million, a pre-primary campaign finance report shows.
During the second half of 2025, Ramaswamy’s war chest grew by nearly $10 million—an amount that excludes any of his personal funds, his campaign said early this year.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Pre-primary cash available for Acton totaled about $5 million, after expenditures of about $3.3 million. Her campaign asserted that contributions were rising, with “clear momentum and support from every corner of the Buckeye State.”
Putsch’s report showed he had less than $9,000 on hand after spending about $94,000.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.