JD Rucker
  • Home
  • About JD Rucker
    • Find Me
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About JD Rucker
    • Find Me
    • Contact
No Result
View All Result
JD Rucker
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Randi Weingarten Resigns From DNC After Dustup With Chair Ken Martin

by Substack
June 16, 2025
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read
Randi Weingarten

(Substack)—Randi Weingarten, a prominent figure in Democratic politics and president of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT), has stepped down from her role on the Democratic National Committee (DNC). Her resignation, announced in a letter dated June 5, 2025, comes amid tensions with the DNC’s new chairman, Ken Martin, highlighting growing divisions within the Democratic Party.

Weingarten, who leads a union of 1.8 million members, had served on the DNC since 2002 and its influential Rules and Bylaws Committee since 2009. This committee plays a key role in shaping the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination process. However, her support for Ben Wikler, Martin’s rival in the DNC chairmanship race earlier this year, led to her removal from the Rules and Bylaws Committee by Martin.

The ONLY faith-driven, patriotic news curator that opposes the left AND the “woke right.”

In her resignation letter, Weingarten declined Martin’s offer to remain on the broader DNC, stating, “While I am proud to be a Democrat, I appear to be out of step with the leadership you are forging, and I do not want to be the one who keeps questioning why we are not enlarging our tent and actively trying to engage more and more of our communities.”

Weingarten’s exit underscores the internal chaos within the Democratic Party, which appears to be struggling to unify its base. Her resignation suggests that even prominent figures like Weingarten, a longtime Democratic ally, feel sidelined by leadership decisions that prioritize control over inclusivity.

Conservatives argue that this kind of infighting weakens the Democrats’ ability to present a cohesive front, especially as they face a resurgent Republican Party focused on expanding its own voter base.

The Democrat Party’s turmoil doesn’t end with Weingarten. Ken Martin’s leadership has faced criticism from within, notably from David Hogg, a DNC vice chairman who recently challenged Martin by announcing plans to fund primary challenges against sitting Democrats—a move considered highly unusual for party officials.

Weingarten had supported Hogg’s efforts, saying it was necessary to “ruffle some feathers.” However, Hogg’s actions backfired, as the party voted to redo the vice chair election due to a technicality, prompting Hogg to announce he would not seek to retain his post.

Adding to the drama, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, a Martin ally, expressed frustration with the public disputes during an appearance at the Center for American Progress on Friday.

Advisor Bullion Surge

“I certainly wished we wouldn’t have dirty laundry in public, but you know the personalities, things happen,” Walz said. Despite the conflicts, he maintained confidence in Martin, adding, “I don’t think Ken’s focus has shifted one bit on this of expanding the party.”

This public squabbling is evidence of a Democrat Party in disarray, unable to reconcile its progressive and moderate factions. The removal of influential figures like Weingarten and the backlash against Hogg’s aggressive tactics suggest a leadership that is more focused on consolidating power than building a broad coalition. This internal dysfunction could provide an opening for Republicans to capitalize on voter frustration with a divided and disorganized opposition.

As the Democrat Party grapples with these challenges, Weingarten’s resignation serves as a warning sign that even its most loyal supporters are questioning its direction. For conservatives, this is a moment to highlight the contrast with a Republican Party that, under unified leadership, is working to expand its appeal to working-class and minority voters. The Democrats’ loss of a key figure like Weingarten may further weaken their position as they head into future elections.

Bypass Big Tech Censors


Fastest Growing





Two Storms, One Harvest

Empty Shelves

Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.

What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.

Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.

This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.

Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.

Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.

The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running

While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.

The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.

Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.

The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.

Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.

The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?

The System Has No Slack Left

The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.

Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.

There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.

The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.

What Joseph Knew

Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.

Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.

Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.

Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.

None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.

Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.

Tags: DemocratsDNCLedeStickyTop Story

Related Posts

News

Judge Stops DHS From Inspecting Migrant Trucker Licenses

August 18, 2026
News

Federal Judge Releases Woman Accused of Defacing Sacred Wwii Memorial — No Cash Bond Required

August 18, 2026
News

VIDEO: They Thought the ‘Traumatized Sailors’ Story Would Sink Trump

August 18, 2026
Next Post
Volodymyr Zelensky (1)

Zelensky’s Latest Tweetstorm Is Full of Panic

An historical milestone reached; gold futures closed above $3000

Gold: The Global Financial System's Lie-Detector?

Pete Hegseth

Hegseth Says Trump’s Stance on Iran Holds Firm as NSC Heads Into Situation Room

JD Rucker

© 2026 JD Rucker - Ephesians 6:12

Navigate Site

  • About JD Rucker
  • Contact

Follow Me

No Result
View All Result
  • Home

© 2026 JD Rucker - Ephesians 6:12