(DCNF)—Republicans are pushing back against Democrat demands on healthcare with proposals of their own that they say will shift control from insurers to individual consumers.
The standoff fueling the record-setting government shutdown centered on Democrats’ refusal to budge on extending enhanced Obamacare premium subsidies, which they passed in 2021 without GOP support and set to expire at the end of 2025. Republicans are developing an alternative that redirects those subsidies away from insurers — who they say have profited excessively since the inception of Obamacare — and straight to consumers buying health coverage.
The House of Representatives is on the verge of approving a Senate-passed spending package to reopen the government that omits an extension of the enhanced Obamacare premium subsidies. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has offered to hold a vote on a Democrat-authored Obamacare subsidy extension bill, but the measure is likely to fail given deep opposition among Republicans.
Critics of Obamacare, formally known as the Affordable Care Act (ACA), point to the fact that ACA premiums have increased nearly twice as fast since 2014 as employer-sponsored insurance plans as evidence that the status quo pushed by Democrats is not working. Extending the subsidy expansions would cost up to $350 billion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
“Obamacare, since its inception, has consistently seen premiums go up for the people in the individual marketplace by amounts that are just … not sustainable,” Thune told reporters Monday. “We need some fixes. We need some solutions.”
Among the Republicans leading the charge is Sen. Bill Cassidy of Louisiana, chairman of the Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. Cassidy has pitched channeling federal funds into Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs), which would allow individuals to set aside pre-tax dollars for medical expenses.
“What I’ve been advocating is that we redirect the subsidies into Flexible Spending Accounts, and it could be the same amount of money per person, but it would be in an FSA, not going to the insurance company,” Cassidy told reporters on Monday. “When you send it to the insurance company, they take 20% of that for overhead and profit — pretty high carrying cost. You send it to the patient, almost all of it’s going to go for direct health care.”
Republican Sen. Rick Scott of Florida also said he is crafting a bill that would allow federal dollars to be distributed to “HSA-style accounts,” saying it would “increase competition [and] drive down costs.”
The concept has the backing of President Donald Trump, who urged Republicans Sunday to give money currently going to insurance companies to individuals, warning that extending the boosted Obamacare subsidies would hand insurers “another huge payday at the expense of the American people.”
No official proposal has been endorsed by Republican leadership, but the Paragon Health Institute, an increasingly influential think tank in Washington, D.C., has been an advocate of subsidy reform for years. In 2022, it published a policy brief outlining a similar plan.
Paragon’s proposal calls for restoring federal funding that reimburses insurance companies for the mandatory discounts they must give qualifying enrollees on out-of-pocket costs like deductibles and copayments, also known as Cost-Sharing Reductions (CSR). The federal government originally covered those costs, but when it stopped making payments in 2017, insurers raised premiums to make up the difference, thereby increasing federal spending on premium subsidies.
Restoring CSR funding would reverse that effect, lowering premiums and reducing the government deficit by about $31 billion, according to the CBO.
Paragon’s plan would also give qualifying enrollees the option to receive their CSR subsidy as a deposit into a Health Savings Account (HSA) rather than as a payment to insurers.
“The whole policy combination would lower premiums, lower deficits and give lower-income Americans more control over their health insurance,” Paragon Health Institute President Brian Blase told the Daily Caller News Foundation. “It is the best thought-out immediate policy that can be put in place to align with the president’s vision.”
Republican Reps. Greg Steube and Kat Cammack of Florida introduced a measure in February that would allow qualifying individuals to receive direct contributions to an HSA. The House version of the GOP’s One Big Beautiful Bill would have directed funding for the CSR program, but it was ultimately rejected by the Senate parliamentarian.
Meanwhile, Democrats have accused Republicans of trying to overhaul Obamacare.
“The future is unpredictable, but we need to continue our fight unequivocally, unyieldingly for affordable health care insurance through extending the subsidies and other measures under the ACA,” Sen. Richard Blumenthal of Connecticut told reporters Monday. “Republicans have a reflexive obsession with repealing or destroying the ACA.”
However, Cassidy emphasized that his proposal has a “very narrow focus.”
“What we’re talking about — this is not rewriting big portions of the Affordable Care Act,” Cassidy said. “We’re looking very specifically at what we can do for Plan Year 2026.”
Blase added that broader ACA reforms represent an “aspirational vision for where we should move,” but developing policies to achieve it will take time and raise many complex questions.
“I’m looking at what can be done in the next few months,” he said.
In the meantime, some Republican lawmakers appear eager to debate Democrats on health care.
“If they don’t want to take this money away from insurance companies and flow it back to the consumer, that’d be a great fight to have,” South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham told reporters.
Adam Pack, Andi Shae Napier and Caden Olson contributed to this report.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
