(The Epoch Times)—A court-appointed U.S. attorney in Seattle who was fired by the Trump administration filed suit on July 21 against the government to prevent his removal from the post.
Although the Department of Justice under President Donald Trump has fired several top federal prosecutors appointed by courts, this new lawsuit by former state judge Roger Rogoff is the first brought by a fired interim U.S. attorney who seeks to block his removal.
This means it could be a test case on presidential authority, coming after the Supreme Court’s landmark ruling last month in Trump v. Slaughter, which expanded the president’s power to fire senior government officials.
Rogoff, who was appointed on July 15 by the judges of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington and fired by the Trump administration about an hour later, filed his motion on July 21 in the same court.
“The President’s actions violate the law, and they ignore the protections of the Constitution of the United States,” Rogoff said in a statement.
“His removal of me, like his removal of other court-appointed U.S. Attorneys across the country, is illegal and cannot stand.”
Rogoff asked the court to rule that his dismissal is invalid and that he is entitled to stay on as U.S. attorney in the judicial district until a Senate-confirmed successor takes his place.
Rogoff was appointed to replace Trump’s choice, Charles Neil Floyd. Floyd began as U.S. attorney in fall 2025, then continued as “first assistant U.S. attorney” after his initial 120-day term ran out, a workaround that allowed him to continue controlling prosecutions in the judicial district. He was not formally nominated by Trump to be U.S. attorney.
Section 546 of Title 28 of the U.S. Code, known as the U.S. attorneys vacancy statute, authorizes federal district courts to appoint an interim U.S. attorney after a temporary 120-day appointment made by the U.S. attorney general lapses without a Senate-confirmed replacement.
Citing the absence of a presidential nomination, the judges appointed Rogoff to the position, after which he was promptly sacked.
In his motion, Rogoff’s attorneys say that the judges “validly appointed” their client as U.S. attorney under Section 546.
“That statute is firmly rooted in, and designed to protect, Congress’s Appointments Clause power to prescribe the method for filling inferior officer vacancies, including for U.S. Attorneys,” they said.
The Constitution’s appointments clause provides that the president may appoint officers to assist him in carrying out his duties. Principal officers must be nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. A principal officer is a high-level employee in the federal government, including cabinet secretaries, heads of major independent agencies, ambassadors, federal judges, and heads of military departments.
Congress has the power to delegate the appointment of so-called inferior officers, including U.S. attorneys, other federal prosecutors, and special counsels, to the president alone, the head of an executive department, or the courts.
Congress has in fact delegated the power to appoint an interim U.S. attorney to the courts in Section 546 after a 120-day appointment by the attorney general runs out.
Under the statute, Rogoff is supposed to serve as U.S. attorney until a successor is nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate, the motion said.
The federal government’s effort to remove Rogoff from the post “violates the clear commands of [Section] 546,” the motion states.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) said the president followed the law.
The department said the district court “did not coordinate with DOJ on this selection.”
“Consistent with other firings of this type, this is wholly within the President’s authority,” it said.
In similar cases, the DOJ has cited Section 541(c) of Title 28 of the U.S. Code in support of dismissals. The provision states, “Each United States attorney is subject to removal by the President.”
Acting U.S. Attorney General Todd Blanche, whom Trump has nominated to assume that post permanently, said on social media last week that Trump acted lawfully.
“District court judges can appoint a temporary U.S. Attorney, and POTUS can fire them,” Blanche said in a post on X on July 15.
Reuters contributed to this report.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.