America’s courts stand as the bedrock of justice, where every citizen expects equal treatment under a single set of laws. Yet, in pockets across the nation, religious arbitration centers—often operating under Sharia principles—have quietly established themselves as alternative forums for resolving disputes, particularly in family and civil matters. These setups challenge the authority of state and federal systems, creating divisions that favor religious doctrine over constitutional guarantees.
Take the Islamic Tribunal in Dallas, established back in 2015 as the country’s first formal body of its kind for handling divorces and business conflicts. Texas Governor Greg Abbott recently directed local district attorneys, sheriffs, and Attorney General Ken Paxton to probe these so-called Sharia courts, insisting they masquerade as legitimate legal entities while undermining American law.
His move follows a September 2025 law he signed banning residential developments that could function as self-contained Sharia enclaves, like the proposed EPIC City project. Abbott’s actions have sparked backlash from Muslims, with the Council on American-Islamic Relations filing a federal lawsuit against him and Paxton, claiming the investigations smear Muslim communities as terrorist-linked.
Nationwide, religious arbitration in family law remains legal if parties consent voluntarily, but critics argue it often involves coercion, especially for women in tight-knit communities. In practice, these tribunals apply rules drawn from Islamic texts that clash with U.S. standards.
For instance, under Sharia, men can divorce unilaterally, while women must seek council approval, sometimes forfeiting financial rights like the bridal gift known as mahr. Inheritance favors sons over daughters, and in some interpretations, a husband’s authority includes physical discipline for perceived disobedience, as outlined in Sura 4:34 of the Qur’an.
This is the steady and not-so-slow creep of Sharia into America’s legal system. What starts as “cultural” decisions will rapidly become legally binding, first within the communities themselves and then in other aspects of American life. This is all part of the Muslim Brotherhood’s 100-year plan, which is now nearly five decades in the making.
“We must call these councils what they are: centers that host a parallel legal system operating simultaneously with federal and state law within the sovereign jurisdiction of the United States,” said journalist David Bumgardner.
Evidence from abroad, like in the United Kingdom, shows women pressured to stay in abusive relationships or denied knowledge of their civil rights. Similar patterns emerge here, where arbitration decisions can gain enforcement in secular courts, blurring lines between faith and law. This setup not only erodes state power but institutionalizes inequalities that American jurisprudence rejects outright.
On the legislative front, momentum builds to address this. In October 2025, Representative Chip Roy introduced H.R. 5722, the Preserving a Sharia-Free America Act, aiming to bar entry to immigrants who adhere to Sharia if it conflicts with U.S. law.
Senator Tommy Tuberville followed with the No Sharia Act, which would prohibit courts from enforcing foreign laws, including Sharia, that violate constitutional rights. Florida lawmakers have filed a state-level version to keep Sharia out of government proceedings.
“Arbitration is a legal term, defining a method of dispute resolution outside of civil litigation… when a religious council makes a determination on the validity of a marriage, or dictates the terms of a divorce settlement or custody arrangement, it is not engaging in worship. It is instead engaging in a legal exercise that blatantly usurps state power.”
Proponents of these tribunals claim they offer cultural sensitivity and efficient resolutions. But allowing them risks a slippery slope where community pressures override individual freedoms, echoing how unchecked immigration policies have enabled such parallel systems to flourish. Ontario, Canada, set a precedent in 2005 by banning religious arbitration in family matters, requiring all disputes to follow provincial law—a model worth emulating to safeguard unity.
The second (and most important and pressing) reason for prohibition is the inherent conflict between the laws applied by these councils and the American principle of legal equality.
At stake is more than procedure; it’s the preservation of a society where justice applies evenly, rooted in traditions that limit exploitation and uphold dignity for all. Sharia’s framework, with its built-in disparities, simply doesn’t align.
American law and Judeo-Christian values cannot coexist with Sharia. Justice for All is non-negotiable.
Shutting down these centers and outlawing Sharia arbitration would reaffirm that in America, one law governs everyone—no exceptions, no shadows.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
