The United States and the United Kingdom are under attack from within. Consider a small sampling of recent stories that the corporate news media have mostly ignored:
Communist commentator Hasan Piker — an America-hating, Muslim anchor baby who grew up in Istanbul — continues to tell his followers that the United States deserved 9/11, while celebrating Antifa domestic terrorism and left-wing assassination culture. After a left-winger allegedly murdered well-known British conservative Ann Widdecombe by bashing her head with a hammer twenty-one times, an Islamic supremacy group called Palestine Action began offering “direct action” training for fellow leftists who wish to learn how to use a hammer to effect “necessary change.”
Linda Sarsour — another America-hating, Muslim anchor baby — wants to burn the Declaration of Independence and “build a document” that celebrates her Islamic supremacist “values.” An unemployed Ethiopian man somehow living in Minnesota murdered three workers at an apartment complex before blaming “the American system,” racism, and xenophobia. (Foreign immigrants sure do learn the “woke” victim-blaming routine fast!)
The British government continues to overwhelm small villages by dumping unvetted, military-aged, Islamic males into “refugee” camps filled with many times more “asylum”-seekers than there are villagers. In the English countryside, creepy migrant males track women and little girls for miles while making threatening, sexual noises.
This is nuts. The above stories, unfortunately, are just representative examples of a much larger number of similarly shocking stories coming from the U.S. and the U.K. in the last couple of weeks. Every day, communists, Islamists, and other left-wingers encourage or perpetrate violence against Americans and Brits. This is no way to live.
Can you imagine Americans or Brits from the WWII-generation limply standing by and holding their tongues while foreigners waged war against their countries? Because that’s what this is — war! Foreign men who do not belong in the United States or the United Kingdom rob, rape, and murder Americans and Brits.
Then left-wing pundits use their platforms to explain to their brainwashed listeners that Americans and Brits deserve to be robbed, raped, and murdered. Eighty years ago, foreigners who celebrated grotesque violence against their host countries would have been tossed into the sea. Now they are handed citizenship, while collaborator-politicians treat them as sympathetic “victims.”
How much longer can this continue? When will the day come when American and British citizens finally decide that protecting their countries from foreign invasion is more important than minimizing the risk of being called a “bigot”? These insults — “racist,” “fascist,” “nationalist,” among others — are ludicrously hollow if the price of avoiding them means doing nothing while our countries are destroyed.
Must Brits really allow Muslim rape gangs to target their daughters in the name of “multiculturalism”? Must Americans really tolerate Islamic supremacists who celebrate 9/11 in order to demonstrate their commitment to “diversity” and “inclusion”?
Must English-speaking peoples really allow themselves to be conquered by non-English-speaking peoples in order to prove that they are “tolerant”? Must we really all “coexist” with foreigners who have no desire to “coexist” with us?
This has gotten so absurd. When an invading army is raping and murdering your countrymen, you don’t take sides with the invaders. You don’t honor the invaders’ culture; you defend your own. You don’t disparage your own people as “bigots” and “racists” for simply not wanting to be raped or murdered.
You don’t look past all the raping and murdering and conclude, “Borders are racist; we should really invite more rapists and murderers into the country.” People who wish to survive the future are going to have to wake up, grow a spine, and acknowledge that they have been under attack for quite some time.
America has distinct advantages over Britain. Because it is a much larger country, America cannot be conquered all at once. Because Americans have a Second Amendment that protects their God-given right to self-defense, they do not depend upon mealy-mouthed government authorities to keep them safe. But in both nations, the threat is the same: Successive generations of government officials have invited foreign nationals to conquer their lands.
There are all kinds of reasons why these traitors might have done so. Some really do despise Western civilization and wish to see it disappear. Others are so enamored of cosmopolitan variety that they probably think little English villages are better off with Pakistani flair.
Many are committed to depopulating the planet but find that the more successful they are in preventing their own people from having babies, the more desperate they are for foreigners to fill in labor force gaps. However, most of these American and British traitors who have spent decades inviting foreigners to invade their own countries did so for the age-old lusts of power and money.
Inviting waves of poor foreigners into Britain and America has driven down working wages, while driving up the price of homes and basic necessities. Wealthy people with assets don’t defend mass immigration policies because they’re compassionate; they defend those policies because they’re greedy.
While the cost of assets in the U.K. and the U.S. has risen during decades of open borders, those armies of third-worlders have also turned into reliable voting blocs and street fighters for unscrupulous politicians. Dividing voters into quarreling groups distracts citizens while giving government officials new justifications for an expansive surveillance state. Consequently, armies of foreigners have made domestic politicians wealthier and more powerful (at least, in the short term).
However much government officials have profited by betraying their own citizens, the day is approaching when the bill for their decades-long betrayals will come due.
Britain’s government has spent the last five years trying to get their citizens worked up about an impending Russian invasion. Politicians and corporate talking heads — many of whom spent the previous decade mocking the Russian Federation for being a third-world “petrol station” destined to collapse — regularly tell Brits that Russian soldiers will soon be at their front doors.
In turn, those politicians and pundits have expected patriotic Brits to catch a “Russophobia” fever and rally around the Union Jack while supporting Westminster’s warmongering. The problem is, of course, that British authorities have demonized patriotic Brits for waving their nation’s flag for so many years that there is little enthusiasm for fighting a foreign war. It turns out that native Brits aren’t thrilled about dying for a government that prefers Pakistani, Iranian, Indian, and “Palestinian” flags to those that fly over England, Scotland, Northern Ireland, and Wales.
One must wonder whether British and American globalists ever considered the possibility that normal people do not put their lives on the line for “multiculturalism.” They do not run up hills in defense of “diversity, inclusion, and equity.”
When governments defame citizens as “racists,” “bigots,” and “fascists,” citizens don’t have much interest in defending their slanderous governments. When political leaders condemn the people for being “nationalists,” they shouldn’t be surprised when the people become less inclined to defend the nation. How could politicians reasonably expect citizens to sacrifice themselves for their homelands when those same politicians have already traitorously handed the people’s homelands over to foreigners?
From the point of view of a lot of Brits and Americans, it makes no sense to fight foreign wars when war is already brewing right at home. And it makes even less sense to fight for the very governments that have invited raping, murderous foreigners inside the nation’s gates.
When Islamic supremacists openly celebrate 9/11 while enjoying all the benefits of living inside the United States, Americans know the enemy walks among them. When British authorities cover up the atrocities of Muslim rape gangs, Brits know Whitehall can’t be trusted. The cost of government betrayal is high and will only continue to rise.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
