Did you know that roughly one in four Americans are on statins? And about half of men between 65 and 75 take them? What if the widespread use of these drugs is based on a misunderstanding about the real cause of heart disease?
For years, we’ve been told that cholesterol is the enemy, and that we need to avoid fats – especially saturated fats – to protect our hearts. But what if that’s not the whole story? What if sugar and carbohydrates are bigger culprits than we ever imagined?
Dr. Boz has seen firsthand how deeply ingrained the low-fat dogma is in her patients, making it challenging for them to embrace a ketogenic diet. The fear of fat and cholesterol is real, but it might be misplaced.
Let’s explore how this cholesterol myth took hold, and what a better approach to heart health might look like.
The Flawed Foundation: How the Cholesterol Hypothesis Took Hold
How did we get to a place where so many people are convinced that fat is bad for their hearts? It all started decades ago.
Back in the 1960s, the American Heart Association began advising people to cut fat, especially saturated fat and cholesterol, from their diets. The food guide pyramid, which was built on these principles, recommended that we get half of our calories from carbohydrates. Fats and oils were relegated to the very top, suggesting we needed hardly any. Looking back, this advice may have been more harmful than helpful.
The message was clear: avoid fat and cholesterol, or you’ll die of a heart attack. This idea was drilled into people’s heads and it’s a belief that’s still around today. Ask many baby boomers what causes heart disease, and a large number will say high-fat foods, cholesterol, or red meat. This is the cholesterol hypothesis: cholesterol builds up, clogs your arteries, and causes a heart attack. But a growing body of evidence suggests that this might not be the case.
What if the real cause of heart disease isn’t fat, but sugar and carbohydrates? It might sound unbelievable. But the carbohydrate-centric model suggests that excessive consumption of sugar and starches leads to insulin resistance, inflammation, and metabolic syndrome. These are the key drivers of atherosclerosis and heart disease.
The Battle of the Doctors: Yudkin vs. Keys
How can the theories about heart disease be so different? The answer goes back to two research doctors and a presidential heart attack.
When President Eisenhower had a heart attack in 1955, it shocked the nation. We were desperate for an explanation. Two main theories emerged, championed by Dr. John Yudkin and Dr. Ancel Keys.
Dr. John Yudkin, a British nutritionist, wrote the book Pure, White, and Deadly in 1972. In it, he predicted that sugar was the core cause of obesity, inflammation, heart disease, and metabolic syndrome. He was an early voice warning about the dangers of sugar.
Ancel Keys, an American physiologist, had a very different view. He joined forces with the processed food and sugar industry and attacked and discredited Yudkin’s work. Keys was a persuasive figure who convinced Americans that they needed more carbohydrates and less meat. With the help of the sugar industry, he was able to sway public opinion and influence dietary guidelines.
The Seven Countries Study: A Critical Examination
How did Ancel Keys convince the American public that saturated fat was the enemy? It stems from his research in the Seven Countries Study.
Keys’ Seven Countries Study seemed to show that as saturated fat consumption increased, so did heart disease. This appeared to be a clear, linear pattern.
Looking back, this study wouldn’t be accepted into a reputable journal today. Why?
- Selection bias: Keys selected countries that he knew would prove his point. He didn’t include data from countries where saturated fat consumption was high but heart disease rates were low.
- Other factors ignored: The study didn’t account for other important factors like socioeconomic status, activity level, and smoking habits.
- Correlation vs. causation: Keys only found a correlation between saturated fat and heart disease. He then extrapolated that saturated fat must be the cause.
Despite these flaws, medical orthodoxy latched onto Keys’ explanation, and it became American policy. Yet, there was no surefire evidence. This decision had long-term negative consequences for public health.
The Statin Empire: Why Reversing the Ideology is So Difficult
Why is it so hard to reverse this incorrect ideology? Money.
It’s lucrative to keep the public believing that cholesterol needs to be lowered to prevent heart disease. One in four Americans are on statins. Half of the men between 65 and 75 are on statins. Yet, there’s no solid evidence that this will reverse their heart disease.
Big pharma strongly resists any attempts to change the narrative around cholesterol and heart disease. They lobby the government to protect their statin income.
You can’t throw drugs at a dietary disease. You’re only treating the symptoms, not the disease itself. Drugs don’t address the underlying issues of insulin resistance, inflammation, and metabolic syndrome that drive heart disease.
A Better Approach: Treating Heart Disease Holistically
Editor’s Note: We are not endorsing these products as we have never tried them. But Dr. Boz seems to make a lot of sense, so if you’re interested in
So, what’s a better approach? Instead of focusing solely on lowering cholesterol with medication, Dr. Boz focuses on addressing the root causes of heart disease through lifestyle changes. She has a video that explains how she treats heart disease with autophagy.
Consider exploring ketogenic diets and lifestyle changes. These can help reduce insulin resistance, inflammation, and metabolic syndrome – the real drivers of heart disease. Check out these resources from Dr. Boz:
- Read Anyway You Can – A Beginner’s Guide to Ketones For Life
- Read KetoCONTINUUM: Consistently Keto For Life and the ketoCONTINUUM Workbook
- Use the Dr. Boz Food Guide
- Enroll in the Consistently Keto Course
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
