Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has taken decisive action in one of her final official moves, rescinding two Biden administration intelligence assessments that minimized the reality of Havana Syndrome and its likely origins in foreign adversary attacks. This reversal confronts years of institutional skepticism that left U.S. diplomats, intelligence officers, and their families to suffer without adequate recognition or support.
Since the first documented cases emerged in late 2016 among American personnel in Havana, Cuba, victims have reported debilitating symptoms including severe vertigo, crushing headaches, profound fatigue, and sudden hearing loss. These anomalous health incidents have affected hundreds—potentially over a thousand—across multiple locations worldwide, disrupting careers and lives in the service of the nation.
Yet under the previous administration, key intelligence assessments concluded with notable confidence that foreign actors were “very unlikely” responsible, effectively sidelining evidence of directed-energy weapons or other sophisticated attacks.
Gabbard’s decision directly addresses analytic shortcomings in those reports, including selective use of evidence and a failure to meet basic standards of objectivity. As one DNI official explained, the move fulfills commitments made to Congress to review these assessments thoroughly, publicize findings, and ensure those impacted by such incidents are never again dismissed or mistreated. This is not mere bureaucratic housekeeping; it signals a broader commitment to restoring integrity in the intelligence community after years of apparent bias against uncomfortable truths.
The timing and context of these original assessments raise serious questions about priorities in the Biden era. While American public servants endured what many described as targeted assaults—symptoms consistent with pulsed radiofrequency or directed-energy exposure—official narratives leaned toward stress, mass psychogenic illness, or environmental factors.
Such conclusions strained credulity, especially as additional cases mounted and whistleblowers highlighted ignored intelligence pointing toward adversaries like Russia. The reluctance to confront potential foreign culpability echoed a pattern of downplaying threats that did not align with preferred diplomatic or political postures.
Recent developments underscore the stakes. Reports indicate the Pentagon has acquired and tested devices potentially linked to these symptoms, including portable units capable of emitting pulsed radio waves. Congressional inquiries, including from the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, have challenged the earlier dismissals, citing direct evidence of inconsistencies in prior analytic processes.
Victims like former CIA officer Marc Polymeropoulos and others have welcomed this shift after enduring not just physical harm but institutional gaslighting.
Gabbard’s memo to the intelligence community emphasized the need for substantive recall due to concerns over analytic bias. This move opens the door for a more rigorous re-examination, one that prioritizes evidence over expediency. In an age of sophisticated technological warfare, ignoring the possibility of novel weapons deployed against our personnel would be reckless. Americans serving abroad deserve better than assessments engineered to avoid geopolitical friction.
Critics may frame this as partisan score-settling, but the human cost demands clarity. Intelligence failures that dismiss real suffering to protect institutional narratives erode trust and national security. Those who sacrifice for the country should not return home questioning whether their government stands with them.
As Scripture reminds us in Isaiah 59:14-15, “And judgment is turned away backward, and justice standeth afar off: for truth is fallen in the street, and equity cannot enter. Yea, truth faileth; and he that departeth from evil maketh himself a prey.”
The rescinding of these flawed reports represents a step toward restoring that truth, ensuring that those who depart from evil in service to the nation are not left as prey.
Gabbard departs the DNI role soon to support her husband through treatment for a rare bone cancer, a personal reminder of the vulnerabilities even public servants face. Her legacy in this instance includes pushing back against convenient dismissals and demanding accountability.
As the Trump administration continues its work, a renewed focus on protecting those on the front lines of global threats cannot come soon enough. The full scope of Havana Syndrome and those responsible must be pursued without hesitation or political filter.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.