JD Rucker
  • Home
  • About JD Rucker
    • Find Me
    • Shows
    • Contact
  • Prepare
    • Long-Term Storage Food
    • The Only Gold Company I Recommend
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
  • About JD Rucker
    • Find Me
    • Shows
    • Contact
  • Prepare
    • Long-Term Storage Food
    • The Only Gold Company I Recommend
No Result
View All Result
JD Rucker
No Result
View All Result
Home News
NATO

U.S. Considers Eliminating UN and NATO Funding

by JD Rucker
April 17, 2025
in News
Reading Time: 2 mins read

  • Not All “Survival Food” Supplies Are Created Equal


(SHTF Plan)—The United States’ ruling class is considering eliminating funding for the United Nations and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) as part of a State Department budget proposal. This would cut about half of the State Department’s budget.

Citing officials and an internal memo, The New York Times [behind a paywall] reported on Monday that the most recent budget proposal would eliminate “almost all funding for international organizations like the United Nations and NATO.”  This news comes as the same ruling class seeks to increase the Pentagon’s budget to $1 trillion.

Parasites Ivermectin Mebendazole

State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce insisted that the United States’ ruling class remains fully committed to the military bloc, NATO. She stressed, however, that Washington does not see NATO as a tool for waging war, but rather as a deterrent to conflict. “We want to make sure… that the nations in NATO can actually deliver on the mission of NATO, which is to be a deterrent. It is not to help with wars or to help fight them… NATO was meant to be a collection of entities that would stop the bad actors from doing the bad thing,” she said.

The Trump administration has repeatedly pushed NATO members to increase their defense spending, arguing the US bears a disproportionate share of the burden. Trump has warned that the US might not defend NATO members who fail to meet spending targets. –RT

While the rulers seek to cut the State Department’s budget, they are increasing defense spending. It all seems counterintuitive. The Trump administration’s narrative, along with its creation of DOGE (Department of Government Efficiency), has been to cut unnecessary spending. So why is war spending necessary? Especially since the rulers also stated they’d like to end a war? Is it so that territories can be taken over militarily? What do you think? Sound off in the comments.


The JD Rucker Show — Rumble — X (Twitter) — YouTube


Bypass Big Tech Censors


Tags: LedeNATOSHTF PlanTop StoryUnited Nations

Related Posts

Trump Biden
News

President Trump Reacts to Biden’s Cancer Diagnosis

May 18, 2025
Hamas (1)
News

Hamas Planned Oct. 7 to Prevent Israel-Saudi Normalization, Documents Confirm

May 18, 2025
21st Century Antitrust Act
News

New York Business Groups Say Antitrust Bill Could Cost Jobs, Hurt Economy

May 18, 2025
Next Post
Real ID

Once the Deadline on May 7th Arrives, They Will Ask You to Show a National ID Card if You Want to Travel by Plane

Tom Homan

Tom Homan Says He Saw Something Proving Abrego Garcia Is "Absolutely" MS-13

Electric Vehicle

Automakers May Restrict Gas, Regular Hybrid Car Sales if California's Draconian EV Rule Holds

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

JD Rucker

© 2025 JD Rucker - Ephesians 6:12

Navigate Site

  • About JD Rucker
  • Contact

Follow Me

No Result
View All Result
  • Home

© 2025 JD Rucker - Ephesians 6:12

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?
-
00:00
00:00

Queue

Update Required Flash plugin
-
00:00
00:00