Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi recently predicted that within twenty years, every car on the road will be autonomous and that human driving will become little more than a nostalgic hobby—something people do “like horseback riding.” To the casual observer, it may sound like a futuristic forecast. But to anyone paying attention, it’s a window into a broader agenda to strip away independence, privacy, and human control from daily life.
Business Insider reports that in a recent conversation with Axel Springer CEO Mathias Döpfner, Khosrowshahi shared his vision for the future of transportation, predicting that all cars will be autonomous in around 20 years. This shift, according to Khosrowshahi, could lead to a significant reduction in private car ownership and an increased focus on safety metrics for autonomous vehicles.
For a century, the automobile has represented freedom—freedom of movement, of choice, of individuality. Americans don’t just drive cars; they live out one of the last tangible forms of liberty left in the modern world. The open road symbolizes the ability to go where you please, when you please, without permission. Khosrowshahi’s statement—delivered with the confidence of a man convinced of inevitability—exposes how Silicon Valley’s vision of progress is really a plan for centralized control.
“Humans are fallible, and I think there’s much less permissiveness for machines to make those kinds of mistakes, especially if those mistakes lead to fatality,” Khosrowshahi said during the MD MEETS podcast. He emphasized that as autonomous driving technology matures, machines will undoubtedly become safer than human drivers.
When the Uber CEO likens driving to horseback riding, he’s drawing a parallel to history’s industrial shift. Horses were once essential for transportation and labor. Then came machines, and within a generation, an entire way of life vanished. But horses didn’t just fade because of better technology—they were replaced by systems that consolidated power in fewer hands. The same will happen if cars become “self-driving” in name but government-controlled in practice.
Autonomous vehicles depend on continuous connectivity, data sharing, and regulatory oversight. Every mile driven by an AI car is logged, analyzed, and monitored. The human driver’s choices—routes, destinations, even speed—become obsolete, replaced by algorithmic efficiency and government-approved pathways. Imagine “safety updates” that restrict movement during protests, or “carbon quotas” that limit travel for environmental reasons. The infrastructure for that kind of digital leash already exists, and the elites know it.
Khosrowshahi, whose company has long embraced automation to cut labor costs, isn’t just speculating. He’s selling the idea that humans are the problem—too unpredictable, too emotional, too free. The technocratic world he describes is one where trust is placed not in human judgment but in machine obedience. Uber, Google, Tesla, and other AI giants are pouring billions into this future because it promises total control under the guise of convenience.
Once driving becomes “a hobby,” owning a car may soon follow. Why buy a vehicle when you can summon one owned by a corporation or managed by the state? Why bother with insurance, fuel, or maintenance when a cloud-based service can handle it all? That’s the trap: trade self-reliance for ease, trade freedom for automation, trade privacy for “progress.”
It’s no coincidence that this vision aligns with the World Economic Forum’s “You will own nothing and be happy” mantra. A driverless world isn’t just about cars—it’s about conditioning people to surrender autonomy. The same philosophy fuels digital IDs, programmable currencies, and surveillance infrastructure. Take away the steering wheel, and you take away one more layer of personal agency.
America’s founders built a nation on self-governance, not software governance. The right to travel freely without surveillance or restriction is part of what makes us free people. But to the corporate technocrats of Silicon Valley, the concept of freedom is outdated—a bug to be fixed.
If the future is driverless, it’s also directionless. A world that runs on algorithms leaves no room for human instinct, faith, or courage. It leaves no room for the kind of freedom that built this country. And unless Americans start recognizing that every convenience comes with a cost, we may wake up one day to find that even the open road has been paved over by control.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
- Hand-curated links from conservative and Christian sites — NO legacy media garbage links. Patriots get their news every day at JDRucker.com
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
