(The Epoch Times)—New research suggests that modern processed food consumption may be fueling colorectal cancer growth, revealing a link between dietary choices and the inflammatory processes that could drive tumor development.
The study, published in Gut on Tuesday, found that chronic inflammation in colorectal cancer (CRC) stems from an abundance of pro-inflammatory omega-6 fats in tumors and insufficient omega-3 fats to neutralize the inflammation. This imbalance hinders the body’s ability to heal and promotes cancer growth.
Both the pro-inflammatory omega-6 and anti-inflammatory omega-3 fats must be obtained through diet, with omega-6 fats being highly prevalent in ultra-processed foods.
“Our presumption—an association, not a cause at this point in time—is that omega-6-rich diets create more pro-inflammatory building blocks, which enzymes in tumors and the body turn into pro-inflammatory fats,” Dr. Timothy Yeatman, professor of surgery at the University of South Florida (USF) Health Morsani College of Medicine, associate center director for Translational Research and Innovation at the Tampa General Hospital (TGH) Cancer Institute, and a corresponding author of the study, told The Epoch Times.
Diet Shapes Cancer Risk
For the study, scientists from the USF and TGH Cancer Institute examined the role of fats and the genes involved in fat metabolism in CRC. They studied 81 pairs of CRC tumor tissue and healthy tissue, focusing on how the body creates and breaks down fats, which can influence inflammation and cancer growth.
The researchers found that high levels of pro-inflammatory omega-6 fats like linolenic acids (LA) and arachidonic acids (AA) drove the cancer.
The findings indicate that diets high in omega-6 fatty acids may contribute to inflammation that facilitates cancer growth.
The Role of Omega-6 Fatty Acids
Excessive intake of omega-6 fatty acids like LAs found in ultra-processed foods and seed oils results in an overproduction of AA in the body. AA is a precursor that gives rise to more pro-inflammatory molecules that can exacerbate inflammation and promote tumor growth.
The body breaks down these omega-6 fatty acids into inflammatory molecules called leukotrienes, Yeatman said, “and that’s what we found in the tumors.”
Leukotrienes activate immune cells, amplify inflammation, and damage tissues, creating an environment conducive to tumor growth in CRC patients.
Ultra-processed foods include meat products such as sausages, hotdogs, chips, sweetened and alcoholic drinks, mass-produced bread, condiments, and ice cream.
Inflammation: A Strong Link to Diet
In healthy tissues, the body transitions from inflammation to healing through a process called lipid class switching, where pro-inflammatory molecules shift to anti-inflammatory fats like prostaglandins, which signal tissue repair.
Inadequate or ineffective levels of prostaglandin leads to defective class switching, resulting in unresolved inflammation. Prostaglandin also prevents the body from turning omega-6 fatty acids into inflammatory leukotrienes.
The research team observed that CRC tumors produce excessive pro-inflammatory molecules while exhibiting 70 percent lower levels of prostaglandins, essential for resolving inflammation. This deficiency disrupts the lipid class-switching process, perpetuating an environment that promotes tumor growth and survival.
Chronic inflammation fosters a microenvironment conducive to immunosuppression, allowing genetic mutations to persist and ultimately manifest as cancer, Yeatman said.
“We found that over the decades, starting around the 50s, the levels of omega-6 in our body fat have increased dramatically,” he added. “So what’s changed in our diet since then? It’s largely the rise of ultra-processed foods and big agriculture, driven by making food production much cheaper. As a result, less expensive seed oils are used as opposed to more pro-resolving oils, like olive and avocado oils.”
Problematic Immune Cells
Specialized white blood cells, which promoted inflammation in the tumors studied, were also key contributors to CRC. These immune cells initially get drawn to the tumor site to kill the cancer but instead become transformed to facilitate tumor growth.
Yeatman said that this behavior has been observed in other cancers.
“The same processes are likely involved in heart disease, in diabetes, in Alzheimer’s disease,” he added.
What Can Be Done?
Yeatman said we should be mindful of our diets and look at ingredient labels.
“These results (study findings) underscore the need for additional studies that explore what specifically in our diet drives a person’s risk of tumor formation,” Dr. Raaj Mehta, instructor in medicine at Harvard Medical School, attending physician at Massachusetts General Hospital, and not part of the study, told The Epoch Times. “Prevention is essential. We need better ways to counsel our patients about what not to eat and why.
“Hundreds of studies have shown a connection between what we eat and our risk for colorectal cancer. We think this may be mediated by the trillions of bacteria in our digestive tract.”
While little is known about how preservatives and artificial sweeteners affect the microbiome, Yeatman said the microbiome is a critical component in cancer development because it’s the microbiome that processes fats and turns them into different compounds.
“We are supersaturated with arachidonic acid, which is omega-6,” he said. As omega-6 is an essential fatty acid, Yeatman emphasized that he is not saying it’s a bad oil but that too much of anything is bad. “So you should be eating a balanced one-to-one ratio.”
The findings of this study also introduce the concept of resolution medicine, a natural approach to treating inflammation. “It’s based on a concept that natural agents may induce lipid class switching,” Yeatman said.
The study opens the door for new avenues for treatment alongside traditional methods, including resolvin therapies, which use natural agents such as frankincense, cannabidiol (CBD) oil, and celastrol to support this metabolic shift, gene targeting to alter pro-inflammatory pathways, and reprogramming the tumor microenvironment to enhance anti-inflammatory responses.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
