Imagine seeing protesters marching with signs that read, “Burn a Tesla: Save Democracy.” Sounds crazy, right? What’s even more shocking is that some people have actually torched Teslas and Tesla dealerships. These incidents have sparked outrage and raised a crucial question: Who’s paying for all this?
Let’s dive into the details and uncover the potential sources of funding behind these controversial actions. Video summary generated by AI.
The Ellsworth-O’Neil Investigation
Dave Ellsworth, host of “The Dave Ellsworth Show,” and Tyler O’Neil from The Daily Signal, teamed up to explore this very issue. They want to know where the money is coming from to fuel these protests. Why are people resorting to such destructive behavior, like throwing Molotov cocktails at cars or keying random vehicles?
Dave expressed his deep concern over the seemingly random attacks on Tesla owners. After all, anyone could be driving one of those cars.
Is it Demonization and Bureaucracy?
Tyler O’Neil believes that these protests are a result of the left’s constant “demonization” of efforts to hold the government accountable. He points out that when President Trump came into office, he challenged the status quo. Elon Musk stood alongside him, questioning government waste and fraud. According to O’Neil, this scrutiny has triggered a massive backlash from those who benefit from the current system.
O’Neil raised a critical point: taxpayer money is being used to fund “woke causes” in other countries. For example, he questioned why American tax dollars are going to support journalism in Ukraine, while American journalists struggle to make ends meet.
“It’s perverse,” he argues. “It’s like saying that the American people and their work and their taxes don’t matter as much as promoting some woke cause halfway across the world.”
He also notes that the bureaucracy is fighting back against these efforts tooth and nail. They’re using lawsuits and court injunctions to tie the hands of those trying to bring about change. As O’Neil puts it, “If you put bureaucracy in for the word democracy, then they’re actually right” when they say democracy is ending.
Following the Money Trail
Tyler O’Neil’s research goes deep into the funding sources of these movements.
O’Neil is the author of “The Woketopus: The Dark Money Cabal Manipulating the Federal Government.” The book exposes how left-wing activist groups have infiltrated the federal government, pushing their agendas through the bureaucracy. O’Neil argues that many Democrats fear the end of this bureaucratic control.
Organizations like Indivisible have been involved in organizing protests against Tesla. While they claim to encourage peaceful protests and not support violence, some find their rhetoric questionable.
How does “Burn a Tesla: Save Democracy” align with peaceful protest?
Astra Nomani was interviewed on “The Dave Ellsworth Show” to offer further insights into this issue. Her expertise sheds more light on the motivations and funding behind these protests.
The discussion also touched on the role of George Soros in funding “soft on crime” policies across the country. These policies, particularly in places like California, have led to a situation where property crimes are often overlooked or lightly punished.
Is there a double standard at play when it comes to prosecuting different types of crimes? Here’s a summary of Soros’s alleged influence:
- Funding “soft on crime” policies
- Supporting rogue prosecutors
- Creating a double standard in law enforcement
What’s at Stake?
Allowing property destruction to go unpunished has far-reaching consequences. It erodes the very foundation of property rights and sends a dangerous message that violence and vandalism are acceptable forms of protest.
The fear of vandalism and arson could also have a chilling effect on Tesla sales. People might be hesitant to buy a Tesla if they fear it could become a target. This, in turn, could negatively impact the company’s value. Is burning peoples property an act of domestic terrorism?
Despite these attacks, Elon Musk seems determined not to back down.
Final Thoughts
The incidents of arson and vandalism targeting Tesla have sparked a critical conversation about the funding and motivations behind these actions. While the line between peaceful protest and violence may seem clear, the rhetoric and the consequences of these actions deserve closer scrutiny. By following the money trail and understanding the broader implications, we can better address the underlying issues and protect the rights of everyone.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
